Did Galgotias University Face Backlash Over a Chinese Robot Dog at AI Summit Expo?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, Feb 18 (NationPress) Galgotias University, under intense scrutiny from various sectors for almost a day, was expelled from the AI Summit Expo on Wednesday evening due to the debacle and national disgrace caused by its association with a Chinese robotic dog.
The Greater Noida-based institution released a statement on Wednesday, expressing that it was deeply regretful about the situation and confirmed its departure from the designated area at the AI India Expo.
The controversy stemmed from the AI Summit Expo on Tuesday when a professor from the university showcased a Chinese robotic dog at its pavilion, claiming its AI features and labeling the robodog as a ‘pioneering achievement’ by its students.
Initially hesitant to express remorse, Galgotias University eventually issued a public apology, acknowledging its “sincere regret” for the misleading information presented during the Expo.
The university mentioned that the professor responsible for the incident was ill-informed.
“She lacked knowledge regarding the product's technical background and, in her eagerness to be in the spotlight, provided factually incorrect information despite not being authorized to speak with the media,” the statement read.
Neha Singh, a communications professor at Galgotias University, informed a journalist on Tuesday that the displayed robotic dog, named Orion, was created by the Centre of Excellence at Galgotias University.
This claim was quickly debunked by online users and tech experts, who identified it as a creation of China’s Unitree Robotics.
The shocking revelations resulted in a strong backlash against the university, with experts and the public condemning the institution for tarnishing the largest AI Summit held at Bharat Mandapam in the capital, bringing dishonor to the nation.
Earlier on Wednesday, the lights at the university's stall were turned off, and its staff were seen departing the Expo. When approached by journalists, they attempted to evade the topic.
In a previous clarification, the university stated that it “never claimed ownership of the device” and that it was sourced from a Chinese manufacturer to familiarize its students with advancements in AI technology.