Is Ashok Gehlot Right to Criticize the Rajasthan Government Over Gravel Mafia and SI Recruitment Delays?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Ashok Gehlot's bold critique of the Rajasthan government shines a light on the alarming rise of criminal activities by the gravel mafia and the unresolved issue of Sub-Inspector recruitment. Will the government heed his warnings, or is the public's trust eroding?
Key Takeaways
- Ashok Gehlot criticizes the Rajasthan government for inaction against the gravel mafia.
- Concerns were raised following the death of a police constable in Jodhpur.
- Gehlot urges for resolution of the SI recruitment delays.
- He emphasizes the need for decisive action to restore public trust.
- Rising gravel prices are linked to unchecked illegal mining.
Jaipur, May 29 (NationPress) Former Chief Minister of Rajasthan, Ashok Gehlot, has severely criticized the state government regarding escalating criminal activities linked to the gravel mafia and the ongoing delays in the Sub-Inspector (SI) recruitment process.
While addressing the media at the Jaipur airport, Gehlot voiced his alarm regarding the law and order situation, particularly after the unfortunate death of a police constable in Jodhpur during an attack by gravel smugglers.
Commenting on the tragic event in Jodhpur, Gehlot remarked, "The gravel mafia has gained such significant power that the government seems utterly powerless. If the Chief Minister and his ministers cannot control the mafia, it indicates potential collusion between them."
He noted that the government’s inability to act raises substantial concerns.
"You might be receiving political contributions or have other interests, but your inaction against them is clear. The public will perceive you as being complicit," he stated.
Regarding the ongoing SI recruitment process, Gehlot lambasted the government for leaving potential candidates in a state of uncertainty.
"Take the necessary actions. Governments come and go. If there is a paper leak or any wrongdoing, investigate it, penalize the wrongdoers, and incarcerate them; we have no objections. But do not leave it unresolved for an indefinite period."
He stressed the necessity of decisive actions for the aspiring youth, asserting that prolonged delays only diminish public trust and foster frustration among job seekers.
Gehlot also highlighted the alarming rise in gravel prices, attributing it to unregulated illegal mining.
"During our administration, we made efforts to combat these activities with integrity. Even if the current government is attempting to act, the ongoing collusion is apparent," he said.
The former Chief Minister concluded by cautioning that the public is closely monitoring the situation and will not tolerate inaction or alleged corruption indefinitely.
Point of View
It is vital to approach this situation with an unbiased lens. Gehlot’s concerns reflect the public's unease over law enforcement and governance. It is essential to assess the effectiveness of the current administration in addressing crime and fulfilling recruitment promises, as public trust hinges on accountability and transparency.
NationPress
10/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are Ashok Gehlot's main criticisms of the Rajasthan government?
Gehlot criticizes the government for the rising power of the gravel mafia and the delays in Sub-Inspector recruitment, questioning their commitment to law and order.
What incident prompted Gehlot's remarks?
Gehlot's remarks were prompted by the death of a police constable in Jodhpur, which occurred during an attack by gravel smugglers.
How does Gehlot view the government's handling of illegal mining?
He believes that the government's inaction regarding illegal mining reflects collusion and undermines public trust.
What does Gehlot suggest regarding the SI recruitment process?
He urges the government to resolve the delays, investigate any irregularities, and take decisive action for the benefit of aspiring candidates.
What are the implications of Gehlot's statements on public perception?
Gehlot's statements suggest that public perception may lean towards viewing the government as complicit with criminal activities if they continue to remain inactive.
