Giriraj Singh attacks Rahul Gandhi over Ramlila Maidan rally, plans Padyatra in Begusarai

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Giriraj Singh attacks Rahul Gandhi over Ramlila Maidan rally, plans Padyatra in Begusarai

Synopsis

Union Minister Giriraj Singh took aim at Rahul Gandhi over the Opposition's planned 10-lakh rally at Ramlila Maidan, alleging it risks chaos in Delhi, while simultaneously announcing a counter Padyatra in Begusarai on 2 November — a two-front political response to the growing Opposition campaign over Bihar's electoral rolls and EVM credibility.

Key Takeaways

Union Minister Giriraj Singh attacked Rahul Gandhi on 31 October 2026 over the Opposition's proposed 10-lakh-people rally at Ramlila Maidan , Delhi.
Singh warned the rally could cause chaos in the national capital and urged Gandhi to follow the path of Mahatma Gandhi in political protest.
He announced a 'Pratikar Padyatra' in Begusarai on 2 November as a counter-mobilisation.
Singh challenged the Opposition to submit evidence of voter deletion to the Election Commission of India rather than holding rallies.
He cited Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala 's statement in Kerala to question why similar electoral concerns were not raised in other states.
Singh dismissed EVM fraud allegations, pointing to Opposition defeats in ballot-paper elections and voter rejection in Tripura council polls.

Union Minister Giriraj Singh on Saturday, 31 October 2026, launched a pointed attack on Congress MP and Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, over the Opposition's proposed 10-lakh-people rally at Ramlila Maidan in Delhi, alleging it could trigger chaos in the national capital. Speaking at a press conference at Dinkar Guest House in the refinery complex in Begusarai, Singh also announced a 'Pratikar Padyatra' in Begusarai on 2 November.

Singh's Challenge to Rahul Gandhi

Advising the Congress leader to follow the path of Mahatma Gandhi, Singh said that political protests must be conducted peacefully, without attempts to force entry into places or engineer disorder. He questioned the political agenda behind the massive proposed mobilisation, arguing that mass gatherings of this nature risked destabilising the capital rather than delivering legitimate democratic dissent.

On Electoral Roll Allegations and EVMs

Addressing the Opposition's broader campaign, Singh questioned allegations surrounding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, the credibility of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), alleged vote theft, and demands for regime change. He asked why Opposition parties had not submitted evidence directly to the Election Commission of India (ECI) if they genuinely believed voters' names had been illegally deleted during the SIR exercise.

Singh challenged Opposition leaders to visit villages and verify with residents how many voters had actually been removed from the rolls — a direct counter to claims of systematic disenfranchisement. Citing a statement by Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala in Kerala, he further questioned why the Opposition was not raising similar concerns about electoral processes in other states where elections had already been held under the same framework.

The EVM Credibility Debate

Targeting parties that routinely question EVM credibility, Singh alleged that Opposition leaders default to blaming machines or alleging vote theft whenever they lose an election. He argued that Opposition parties also face defeats in ballot-paper-based elections, undermining the machine-manipulation narrative. Referring to recent village committee elections and the Tripura Legislative Council elections, he claimed voters were actively rejecting certain political parties — not that votes were being stolen.

Context and What's Next

Singh's remarks come amid an intensifying Opposition campaign over alleged irregularities in Bihar's electoral rolls and a coordinated push to mobilise supporters at Ramlila Maidan. The announced Pratikar Padyatra on 2 November in Begusarai signals the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s intent to counter the narrative on home turf. With the Opposition rally and the BJP's grassroots response both imminent, the political temperature around electoral integrity is set to rise further in the coming days.

Point of View

But the Kerala comparison — invoking Chennithala — is a sharper move, designed to expose the Opposition's selective outrage. What the mainstream narrative may underplay is that the SIR exercise in Bihar has become a proxy battleground for the 2025 assembly election, and every statement on electoral rolls now carries that subtext. The real question is whether the Opposition can convert rally numbers into verified grievances before the ECI — and whether the BJP's counter-mobilisation can neutralise that optics advantage before the crowd gathers.
NationPress
1 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Giriraj Singh attack Rahul Gandhi over the Ramlila Maidan rally?
Singh alleged the Opposition's proposed 10-lakh rally at Ramlila Maidan in Delhi could lead to chaos in the national capital and questioned its political agenda. He advised Rahul Gandhi to follow the peaceful methods of Mahatma Gandhi rather than attempting to force entry into places or create disorder.
What is the 'Pratikar Padyatra' announced by Giriraj Singh?
It is a foot march announced by Singh to be held in Begusarai on 2 November, framed as a counter to the Opposition's campaign over alleged electoral roll irregularities and EVM fraud claims. Singh made the announcement at a press conference in Begusarai on 31 October 2026.
What did Giriraj Singh say about the Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's electoral rolls?
Singh questioned why Opposition parties had not submitted evidence of illegal voter deletions to the Election Commission of India if they believed names were removed during the SIR exercise in Bihar. He challenged Opposition leaders to verify directly with village residents how many voters had actually been taken off the rolls.
How did Singh respond to allegations that EVMs are unreliable?
Singh alleged that Opposition parties tend to blame EVMs or allege vote theft only when they lose elections, arguing that they also face defeats in ballot-paper-based elections. He cited recent village committee elections and the Tripura Legislative Council elections as examples of voters rejecting certain parties — not of machines being manipulated.
Why did Singh mention Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala?
Singh cited a statement by Chennithala in Kerala to question why the Opposition was not raising similar electoral process concerns in states other than Bihar, where elections had already been conducted under the same SIR framework. The reference was aimed at exposing what Singh characterised as selective criticism of the electoral process.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 6 hours ago
  2. 2 days ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 3 weeks ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google