Piyush Goyal accuses Congress of 'regime change' conspiracy to seize power

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Piyush Goyal accuses Congress of 'regime change' conspiracy to seize power

Synopsis

A single phrase — 'regime change' — has ignited a full-scale BJP offensive against Congress and its allies. After senior advocate Prashant Bhushan openly demanded regime change at a press conference, three senior BJP leaders including Piyush Goyal, Rajnath Singh, and Devendra Fadnavis each attacked the opposition on the same day, with Singh drawing an explosive parallel to the political upheaval in Bangladesh.

Key Takeaways

Union Minister Piyush Goyal accused Congress of plotting to seize power by creating anarchy, in a post on X on 16 October 2026 .
The row was triggered by senior advocate Prashant Bhushan stating 'Yes, we want regime change' at a press conference on Thursday .
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh , speaking in Lucknow , alleged the opposition was drawing inspiration from events in Bangladesh to destabilise the government.
Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis posted on X that Bhushan's remark had 'exposed' the real objective behind the protests.
The BJP argues the agitation — nominally over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar — is actually aimed at toppling the government through extra-electoral means.

Union Minister Piyush Goyal on Friday, 16 October 2026, launched a sharp attack on the Congress party, accusing it of plotting to seize power by fomenting anarchy in the country. Goyal said the use of the phrase 'regime change' by the opposition had exposed the true intent behind their agitation — one that had nothing to do with electoral reform, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), or Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

Goyal's Charge on X

In a post on X, Goyal wrote: 'The use of terms like ‘Regime Change’ makes it clear that their fight is not for electoral reform, not for SIR, not for Gyanesh Kumar, not for the bright future of the country’s youth. Rather, this is their conspiracy to seize power by creating Anarchy in the country.' The minister's remarks were a direct response to senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, who at a press conference on Thursday openly said, 'Yes, we want regime change.'

Rajnath Singh Invokes Bangladesh

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, addressing a separate press conference in Lucknow, escalated the attack by drawing a parallel with Bangladesh, alleging that the opposition was seeking to replicate a similar destabilisation playbook. 'They want to change the regime like in Bangladesh and openly mention in their press conference that they are motivated by Bangladesh and talk about bringing down the government. It clearly shows that their sole agenda is to destroy democratic institutions,' Singh said. Goyal also shared Singh's remarks on his social media handles, amplifying the Bangladesh comparison. Singh further alleged that when 'political selfishness is placed above truth or the nation’s interests, democratic discourse becomes a victim of obstinacy and malicious propaganda.'

Fadnavis Joins the Offensive

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis also weighed in, posting on X that Bhushan's statement had 'exposed' the alleged motive behind the protests. 'It’s done bro, everything is exposed!! After all, it was all about ‘Regime Change’... In the end, the secret hidden in the heart came to the lips! The whole game is about grabbing the seat of power... and for that, why not provoke students and farmers, spread hatred in the name of caste and language, or tarnish the image of the country’s esteemed institutions? Spreading anarchy under the guise of a movement is precisely ‘their’ objective,' Fadnavis posted. He also shared a video clip of Bhushan's press conference alongside his remarks.

The Row That Triggered the Backlash

The political storm erupted after Bhushan's remarks at a press conference on Thursday, where he acknowledged demands for a change in government. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) seized on the statement to argue that the broader opposition agitation — ostensibly centred on concerns about the Election Commission and the SIR process — was in reality driven by a desire to topple the ruling dispensation through extra-electoral means. This comes amid an already charged political climate over electoral rolls and the role of the Election Commission, making the 'regime change' remark a flashpoint that both sides are now using to frame the national debate ahead of upcoming electoral cycles.

Point of View

With three senior leaders attacking within hours, signals a deliberate strategy to shift the frame from institutional accountability to anti-democratic intent. What gets buried is the original grievance: the opposition's concerns about electoral rolls and the conduct of the Election Commission. The Bangladesh parallel deployed by Rajnath Singh is particularly pointed — it equates domestic dissent with foreign-inspired destabilisation, a framing that could be used to delegitimise any future mass protest. Whether Bhushan's remark reflects a considered political position or a rhetorical slip, it has done measurable damage to the opposition's ability to hold the moral high ground on electoral reform.
NationPress
16 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Prashant Bhushan say that triggered the political row?
At a press conference on Thursday, senior advocate Prashant Bhushan openly stated 'Yes, we want regime change,' referring to a change in the ruling government. The BJP seized on the remark to accuse the Congress-led opposition of seeking to seize power by creating anarchy rather than pursuing genuine electoral reform.
What did Piyush Goyal accuse Congress of?
Union Minister Piyush Goyal accused Congress of conspiring to seize power by fomenting anarchy, saying the use of the phrase 'regime change' proved the opposition's agitation was not about electoral reform, the SIR process, or Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Goyal made the charge in a post on X on 16 October 2026.
Why did Rajnath Singh mention Bangladesh?
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh alleged that the opposition was drawing inspiration from events in Bangladesh — where the government was brought down amid mass protests — and was seeking to replicate a similar scenario in India. He argued this showed the opposition's sole agenda was to destroy democratic institutions rather than address legitimate concerns about the Election Commission.
What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) at the centre of the original dispute?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is an electoral rolls verification process conducted by the Election Commission of India. The opposition had been agitating over concerns about how the SIR was being conducted and about Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, but the BJP now argues those concerns were a pretext for a broader bid to change the government.
What did Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis say about the controversy?
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis posted on X that Bhushan's statement had 'exposed' the true motive behind the protests, alleging the real goal was to grab power and that tactics like provoking students, spreading caste and language hatred, and tarnishing institutions were being used to that end. He also shared a video of Bhushan's press conference.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 hour ago
  2. 1 hour ago
  3. 1 hour ago
  4. 15 hours ago
  5. 2 days ago
  6. 2 days ago
  7. 2 days ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google