Karnataka HC seeks reply on ex-MLA Vinay Kulkarni's appeal in Yogesh Gowda murder case
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Karnataka High Court vacation bench on 7 May took up the appeal petition filed by former Congress MLA Vinay Kulkarni, who was convicted for the murder of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and Zilla Panchayat Member Yogesh Gowda, and sought a reply from the prosecution. The matter was heard before a Division Bench headed by Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum and Justice Rajesh Rai, which adjourned the case to 26 May.
Background of the Case
Yogesh Gowda was hacked to death by a group of assailants at a gym in Dharwad city on 15 June 2016. Gowda had reportedly been a political challenger to Kulkarni, who was at the time serving as a minister and district in-charge minister. The case was subsequently handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) by the state government.
Kulkarni, listed as accused number 15 in the case, was arrested in 2020 and released on bail in 2021. He was later accused of influencing witnesses, following which the CBI sought cancellation of his bail, alleging violation of bail conditions. The court accepted the plea and revoked his bail.
Conviction and Aftermath
Kulkarni was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. Following the conviction, his MLA position was cancelled on 15 April. In the current proceedings, Kulkarni is challenging the life-term conviction and has sought a stay on the verdict. He was reportedly expecting bail and a stay on the conviction order.
Another accused, Chandrashekar Indi, has also filed a separate appeal petition in the same case.
CBI Seeks Time, Hearing Adjourned
As the hearing commenced, counsel appearing for the CBI submitted that objections relating to the petition were yet to be filed and sought additional time. The bench accepted the request and adjourned the matter to 26 May.
Separate Petition by Police Officer
In the same case, counsel representing Police Circle Inspector Channakeshava Tingarikar — sentenced to seven years' imprisonment — submitted that his client's appeal had initially been listed before a single-judge bench, which later clubbed it with petitions filed by the other accused. The counsel argued that only bailable offences had been invoked against his client and sought bail accordingly. The Division Bench observed that Tingarikar's petition could be heard separately and adjourned that matter to 14 May, according to sources.
With the next hearing scheduled for 26 May, the case continues to test the intersection of political accountability and judicial process in Karnataka.