JD(U) slams Farooq Abdullah over Kashmir remarks, says Pakistan 'always had evil eye'

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
JD(U) slams Farooq Abdullah over Kashmir remarks, says Pakistan 'always had evil eye'

Synopsis

Farooq Abdullah's claim that Pakistan is 'protecting' Kashmiris by internationalising the Kashmir issue has ignited a cross-party firestorm. JD(U)'s Shyam Rajak invoked Sheikh Abdullah's legacy to rebuke his own son, while Pappu Yadav turned the fire on the BJP and RSS — making this a rare moment where the NC, BJP, and JD(U) are all caught in the same political storm over Kashmir's identity.

Key Takeaways

JD(U) National General Secretary Shyam Rajak criticised Farooq Abdullah on 26 October 2026 over remarks on Jammu and Kashmir.
Rajak said Pakistan has 'always had an evil eye on Kashmir' and that Kashmiris were never with Pakistan.
He invoked the legacy of Sheikh Abdullah , Farooq's father, who worked with Maharaja Hari Singh for Kashmir's accession to India.
Farooq Abdullah had claimed at a Baramulla convention that Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif was 'protecting' Kashmiris by raising the issue internationally.
The BJP condemned Abdullah's remarks as being against national interests; Purnia MP Pappu Yadav accused the BJP and RSS of politicising Kashmir.

Janata Dal (United) National General Secretary Shyam Rajak on Monday, 26 October sharply criticised National Conference (NC) President Farooq Abdullah over his recent remarks on Jammu and Kashmir, asserting that Pakistan had always harboured malicious intentions towards the region and that Kashmiris had never sought to be part of Pakistan.

What Rajak Said

Speaking to reporters, Rajak invoked the legacy of Abdullah's own father, Sheikh Abdullah, who had worked alongside Maharaja Hari Singh to facilitate Kashmir's accession to India at a time when Pakistan was, according to Rajak, attempting to destabilise the region through terror.

'Perhaps he does not remember the values taught by his father. Sheikh Abdullah Ji, at a time when Pakistan was trying to trouble Kashmir and spread terror, worked alongside Maharaja Hari Singh to facilitate Kashmir's accession to India,' Rajak said.

He further stressed that Kashmir was an integral part of India and warned that any attempt to view the region with malicious intent would face strong public backlash. 'Pakistan has always had an evil eye on Kashmir. Kashmiris were never with Pakistan. Since childhood, we have been taught that Kashmir is the crown of India,' he added.

The Remarks That Triggered the Row

The controversy erupted after Farooq Abdullah addressed a party workers' convention in Baramulla, north Kashmir, on Saturday, claiming that Pakistan was effectively 'protecting' the people of Jammu and Kashmir by repeatedly raising the Kashmir issue at international forums.

'Our neighbour (Pakistan) is constantly after them. He (Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif) goes everywhere saying that the Kashmir issue has not been resolved. He is protecting us; otherwise, their (Centre's) intentions are not good,' Abdullah had said at the event.

The remarks drew swift and broad condemnation. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accused Abdullah of making statements against national interests and suggested he should leave for Pakistan.

Pappu Yadav Attacks BJP and RSS

Purnia MP Pappu Yadav also weighed in, though from a different angle — accusing the BJP and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) of deliberately making Kashmir a controversial political issue.

'Making issues like Kashmir controversial is in the nature of the BJP and RSS. Kashmir is in our lives, our culture, our blood and our minds. The people of Kashmir are part of India's identity. They chose India over Pakistan,' Yadav said.

Yadav argued that Kashmir's integration with India was rooted in cultural bonds, the people's respect for the Constitution, and long-standing Indian traditions — not merely political decisions.

Political Context and What It Signals

The episode comes at a politically charged moment for Jammu and Kashmir, following the restoration of an elected government in the Union Territory after years of President's Rule. Abdullah's NC recently returned to power, making his remarks all the more scrutinised by rival parties.

This is not the first time Abdullah's statements on Pakistan and Kashmir have ignited political controversy; critics argue a pattern of such remarks has repeatedly put the NC on the defensive. The BJP's response — calling for Abdullah to 'go to Pakistan' — reflects the broader national political temperature around any perceived softening on the Kashmir question.

How the NC leadership manages the fallout, and whether Abdullah issues a clarification, will be closely watched in the days ahead.

Point of View

But JD(U)'s invocation of Sheikh Abdullah cuts deeper, weaponising the NC's own founding narrative against it. What is missing from most coverage is that Abdullah's remarks, while inflammatory, appear aimed at a domestic Kashmiri audience anxious about post-Article 370 governance — not an endorsement of Pakistani sovereignty. That nuance is being crowded out by the political noise, which serves nearly everyone except the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
NationPress
26 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Farooq Abdullah say that sparked the controversy?
At a party workers' convention in Baramulla on Saturday, Farooq Abdullah said Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif was 'protecting' Kashmiris by repeatedly raising the Kashmir issue at international forums, and suggested the Centre's intentions were 'not good'. The remarks were widely condemned by the BJP, JD(U), and others as being against national interests.
What was JD(U)'s response to Farooq Abdullah's remarks?
JD(U) National General Secretary Shyam Rajak said Pakistan had 'always had an evil eye on Kashmir' and that Kashmiris had never wanted to be part of Pakistan. He also invoked the legacy of Sheikh Abdullah — Farooq's father — who had worked to facilitate Kashmir's accession to India.
Why did Shyam Rajak mention Sheikh Abdullah in his criticism?
Rajak invoked Sheikh Abdullah to highlight what he described as a contradiction between Farooq Abdullah's current stance and his father's legacy. Sheikh Abdullah had, according to Rajak, worked alongside Maharaja Hari Singh to secure Kashmir's accession to India at a time when Pakistan was attempting to destabilise the region.
What did Pappu Yadav say about the Kashmir row?
Purnia MP Pappu Yadav accused the BJP and RSS of deliberately making Kashmir a controversial political issue. He maintained that Kashmir's integration with India was rooted in shared culture and the Kashmiri people's respect for the Constitution, adding that Kashmiris had historically chosen India over Pakistan.
How has the BJP reacted to Farooq Abdullah's remarks?
The BJP strongly condemned Abdullah's remarks, accusing him of making statements against national interests. Party leaders reportedly suggested that Abdullah should go to Pakistan, reflecting the intense political backlash his comments have generated across party lines.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 14 hours ago
  2. 20 hours ago
  3. Yesterday
  4. Yesterday
  5. Yesterday
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google