Why is the Jharkhand HC Criticizing the Government Over Municipal Poll Delays?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Jharkhand High Court's stern rebuke of the state's government for not conducting municipal elections raises serious questions about the current state of governance. With officials summoned and a timeline demanded, the court's actions bring to light the ongoing struggles for democratic processes in Jharkhand.
Key Takeaways
- The Jharkhand High Court is demanding accountability from the state government regarding municipal elections.
- Chief Secretary and Principal Secretary were summoned to address the contempt of court.
- The next hearing is scheduled for September 10, with a timeline required for elections.
- The tenure of municipal bodies expired in April 2023, leaving governance in bureaucratic hands.
- OBC reservation discussions have stalled the election process.
Ranchi, Sep 2 (NationPress) The Jharkhand High Court has expressed its discontent with the state administration for not conducting municipal elections despite multiple directives.
On Tuesday, the court summoned the Chief Secretary and the Principal Secretary of the Urban Development Department, who appeared in person during the contempt proceedings.
A bench led by Justice Ananda Sen remarked that the government was “consistently ignoring” the court’s instructions and questioned the rationale behind not initiating contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary.
The court has scheduled the next hearing for September 10 and has instructed the Chief Secretary to provide a definitive timeline for the elections.
During the session, the bench reminded the state that on January 4, 2024, it had explicitly ordered that municipal elections be concluded within three weeks following a petition from outgoing Ranchi Municipal Corporation councillor Roshni Khalkho. Unfortunately, this order has yet to be executed.
Advocate Vinod Singh, representing the petitioner, urged the court to enforce strict penalties for willful non-compliance.
Previously, the court had strongly condemned the government's conduct, stating that by ignoring judicial mandates, the administration was violating the “rule of law” and creating the impression that the “constitutional system has failed in the state.”
All municipal bodies in Jharkhand saw their tenures expire in April 2023. New elections were supposed to take place by April 27 of that year, but the process was halted as the state government sought to determine the percentage of OBC reservation in urban local bodies through a “triple test.”
Despite beginning this exercise nearly a year ago, it remains unfinished.
With no elected officials, the governance of municipal corporations, municipalities, municipal councils, and nagar panchayats has been delegated to government-appointed administrators for over two years, placing urban governance in the state entirely under bureaucratic oversight.
Point of View
The ongoing situation in Jharkhand underscores the critical need for accountability in governance. The High Court's intervention is a vital reminder that judicial authority must be respected to uphold democratic values. It is imperative for state officials to align with constitutional mandates, ensuring fair and timely elections.
NationPress
02/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the Jharkhand High Court to summon state officials?
The court summoned state officials due to the government's failure to conduct municipal elections despite repeated orders.
What is the new deadline set by the Jharkhand High Court for the elections?
The High Court has set **September 10** as the date for the next hearing, demanding a clear timeline for the elections.
What are the consequences of ignoring court orders in this case?
Ignoring court orders could lead to contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary and further legal repercussions.
When did the tenure of municipal bodies in Jharkhand expire?
The tenure of all municipal bodies in Jharkhand expired in **April 2023**.
What is the status of OBC reservation in urban local bodies?
The state government is still determining the percentage of OBC reservation through a 'triple test,' which remains incomplete.
