Will Jitan Ram Manjhi Secure 20 Seats for HAM in Bihar Assembly Elections?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
As the Bihar Assembly elections approach, tensions rise within the NDA coalition. Jitan Ram Manjhi of HAM demands 20 seats, raising questions about seat-sharing dynamics. With LJP insisting on a substantial share, the NDA faces a critical juncture. How will these demands shape the electoral landscape?
Key Takeaways
- Jitan Ram Manjhi demands 20 seats for HAM.
- The NDA coalition is facing tensions over seat-sharing.
- LJP's demand for over 43 seats adds complexity.
- September is crucial for finalizing seat distributions.
- Negotiations remain tense as elections near.
Patna, Sep 3 (NationPress) The NDA coalition is ramping up its efforts as the Bihar Assembly elections approach, with discussions on seat-sharing reaching a critical juncture. Leaders from the five coalition members — the BJP, JD(U), LJP (Ram Vilas), Hindustani Awam Morcha (HAM), and Rashtriya Lok Morcha — are deeply engaged in deliberations regarding the allocation of the 243 Assembly seats. Union Minister and HAM leader Jitan Ram Manjhi has made a clear demand to his allies.
“If the constituent parties of the NDA truly care about us, then they will undoubtedly meet our demand,” Jitan Ram Manjhi stated, emphasizing that HAM requires at least 20 Assembly seats to be recognized as a legitimate party.
This declaration highlights the increasing competition within the NDA over seat allocation, as each party seeks to strengthen its position in the coalition before the elections.
As the Bihar Assembly elections draw near, the primary challenge for the NDA lies in achieving a fair balance in seat-sharing among its allies: the BJP, JD(U), LJP (Ram Vilas), HAM, and the Rashtriya Lok Morcha.
In the previous 2020 Assembly elections, HAM contested 7 seats and won 4. This time, HAM is pushing for a threefold increase in its demand for 20 seats, which presents a significant challenge for the BJP in managing the seat distribution.
The situation has become even more complicated as LJP (Ram Vilas) MP Arun Bharti publicly declared that his party will not accept anything less than a substantial share exceeding 43 seats.
Amid these escalating demands, a high-level strategy meeting is currently taking place in New Delhi, led by Union Home Minister Amit Shah.
Attendees include BJP state President Dilip Jaiswal, Deputy Chief Ministers Samrat Choudhary and Vijay Kumar Sinha, Organisation General Secretary Bhikhubhai Dalsaniya, and Nagendra Nath.
Insiders suggest that September is poised to be a pivotal month for the NDA, as the formal allocation of seats has yet to be settled.
The leadership aims to resolve existing differences and present a united front ahead of the polls, although negotiations remain fraught with tension.
Point of View
The evolving dynamics within the NDA coalition reflect the complexities of electoral politics in India. The demands from various parties highlight the challenges of maintaining unity while striving for a competitive edge in the Bihar Assembly elections. The outcome of these negotiations will be pivotal in determining the coalition's strength and strategy moving forward.
NationPress
03/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Jitan Ram Manjhi demanding 20 seats for HAM?
Jitan Ram Manjhi believes that securing at least 20 seats is essential for HAM to be recognized as a full-fledged party within the NDA coalition.
What challenges does the NDA face in seat-sharing?
The NDA faces significant challenges in balancing seat allocations among its allies, especially with rising demands from parties like HAM and LJP.
How did HAM perform in the last elections?
In the 2020 Assembly elections, HAM contested on 7 seats and won 4, highlighting its potential influence in the upcoming elections.
What is the current status of NDA negotiations?
Negotiations are ongoing, with a high-level meeting in New Delhi aiming to finalize seat distributions amidst rising tensions among coalition partners.
What impact could LJP's demands have on the NDA?
LJP's insistence on a substantial share could complicate the seat-sharing negotiations, potentially straining the coalition's unity as elections approach.
