Did the Karnataka HC Nullify Congress MLA's Election and Order a Recount?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a pivotal judgment, the Karnataka High Court has annulled the election results for Congress MLA K.Y. Nanjegowda from the Malur Assembly. This decision, prompted by a narrow victory margin, has led to a recount order, highlighting the intense political rivalry and legal battles in Karnataka. What implications will this have on the political landscape?
Key Takeaways
- Karnataka High Court invalidates election results.
- Recount ordered for Malur Assembly constituency.
- BJP candidate claims victory margin was only 248 votes.
- MLA Nanjegowda allowed to appeal to Supreme Court.
- Significant implications for political dynamics in Karnataka.
Bengaluru, Sep 16 (NationPress) In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has invalidated the election of Congress MLA K.Y. Nanjegowda from the Malur Assembly constituency during the 2023 elections and mandated a recount. A bench led by Justice R. Devdas delivered the judgement following a petition from the defeated BJP candidate K.S. Manjunath Gowda.
Despite this ruling, the court has permitted MLA Nanjegowda to appeal to the Supreme Court within a 30-day timeframe. Should the apex court deny relief, the Congress legislator risks losing his position.
Previously, the court instructed that the recount should be finalized within four weeks, with results announced thereafter.
Manjunath Gowda initiated this legal action, arguing for a recount due to the narrow margin of just 248 votes separating him from Nanjegowda.
The BJP candidate alleged that counting officials contacted him, claiming victory, but it was later revealed that the Congress candidate had won by that slim margin. This prompted him to pursue a recount in court.
The election petition was filed under Sections 81 of the Representation of the People's Act, 1951, and Rule 4 of the Karnataka Election Petition Rules.
Manjunath Gowda requested the court to summon records, documents, videos, and other materials related to the election, including the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and postal ballots, and to maintain custody of these items.
The petition also sought to annul Nanjegowda's election based on grounds outlined in Section 100 (1) (d), (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv), aiming to declare him as the rightful elected representative of the Malur constituency.
Point of View
It is crucial to observe that the Karnataka High Court's decision reflects the ongoing tensions in Indian politics, particularly in Karnataka. This case underscores the importance of electoral integrity and the legal avenues available to candidates seeking justice. The forthcoming recount will be critical in determining the political fate of K.Y. Nanjegowda and may have broader implications for the Congress party in the region.
NationPress
21/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to the Karnataka HC nullifying the election?
The Karnataka High Court nullified the election due to a petition from BJP's K.S. Manjunath Gowda, who sought a recount after losing by a mere 248 votes.
What are the next steps for K.Y. Nanjegowda?
K.Y. Nanjegowda has the option to appeal to the Supreme Court within 30 days; failure to gain relief will mean he loses his seat.
How long will the recount process take?
The court has mandated that the recount be completed within four weeks, with results to be announced shortly thereafter.
What claims were made about the election results?
Manjunath Gowda claimed that counting officials informed him he had won, only to later announce that Nanjegowda was the victor by 248 votes.
What legal provisions were cited in the petition?
The election petition was filed under Sections 81 of the Representation of the People's Act, 1951, and Rule 4 of the Karnataka Election Petition Rules.
