Why is the Kerala HC Criticizing the SIT for Delays in the Sabarimala Gold Heist Case?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Why is the Kerala HC Criticizing the SIT for Delays in the Sabarimala Gold Heist Case?

Synopsis

The Kerala High Court has sharply criticized the SIT over significant delays in the Sabarimala gold theft investigation, impacting public confidence and enabling accused individuals to secure bail. This situation raises questions about the effectiveness of the probe and judicial integrity.

Key Takeaways

Kerala High Court criticizes SIT for delays.
Delays allow accused to secure statutory bail .
Public confidence in the investigation is at risk.
Legal protections must be upheld for arrested individuals.
SIT faces procedural challenges in preparing charge sheets.

Kochi, Jan 27 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court has recently criticized the Special Investigation Team (SIT) overseeing the Sabarimala gold theft case, voicing significant concerns regarding the prolonged delays in the submission of charge sheets. This situation has allowed several key accused individuals to obtain statutory bail and evade justice.

To date, the SIT has arrested 13 individuals related to the two charge sheets filed, with one person currently on statutory bail.

A bench led by Justice A. Badaruddin cautioned that such delays undermine public trust in the investigation and raise questions about the seriousness of the inquiry.

The court noted that the failure to file charge sheets in a timely manner has led to a situation where accused individuals are released, creating a cloud of suspicion around the integrity of the investigation. The judge inquired why the SIT had not taken appropriate and prompt actions to avoid this predicament.

“When individuals are freed by default, it casts a shadow over the credibility of the investigation,” the judge remarked.

The court drew attention to Murari Babu, a former administrative officer of the Devaswom Board, who is implicated in both the Dwarapalaka and Kattilappala cases and has already received statutory bail.

Additionally, it highlighted that Unnikrishnan Potti, the principal accused in both cases, had acquired bail in the Dwarapalaka case and would soon qualify for statutory bail in the Kattilappala case as the 90-day limit will conclude on February 2.

The remarks came while the court was reviewing a plea from accused Pankaj Bhandari, CEO of Smart Creations, who sought his release. Bhandari argued that he had cooperated fully with the investigation, having provided statements six times before being named an accused, and claimed his arrest was unwarranted.

Nonetheless, the court affirmed that the arrest in this matter was necessary, emphasizing that individuals in custody must receive all legal protections, including statutory bail, per Supreme Court mandates.

In response to the court's worries, the SIT explained that various procedural and evidentiary challenges had contributed to the delay in charge sheet preparation. They stated that documents had been confiscated from Devaswom Board offices and other sites, while critical scientific evidence necessary to confirm the crimes remained pending.

The SIT insisted that even if some accused were released on bail, the investigation's focus would stay on securing convictions and ensuring that those responsible face justice.

In a related development, the Kerala Assembly saw exchanges between Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and Opposition Leader V.D. Satheesan on this matter, with two opposition members staging a protest outside the Assembly, alleging that the former is covertly intervening in the case.

Point of View

I believe that the Kerala High Court's remarks highlight a critical need for timely justice. The delays in the Sabarimala gold heist investigation not only affect the accused but also shake public faith in our judicial processes. It's imperative that investigative bodies act swiftly to uphold the rule of law and ensure accountability.
NationPress
2 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main concerns raised by the Kerala High Court regarding the SIT?
The Kerala High Court expressed concerns over significant delays in filing charge sheets by the SIT, which have allowed key accused to secure statutory bail, thereby undermining public confidence in the investigation.
How many individuals have been arrested in connection to the Sabarimala gold theft case?
Thirteen individuals have been arrested in relation to the two charge sheets filed by the SIT in the Sabarimala gold theft case.
What action did the court take regarding the plea from accused Pankaj Bhandari?
The court reviewed Pankaj Bhandari's plea for release, but emphasized that his arrest was necessary, while also affirming that legal protections must be provided to all arrested individuals.
Nation Press
Google Prefer NP
On Google