Should the NTA Correct the JRF Certificate for Transgender Scholar Rithisha Rithu?

Click to start listening
Should the NTA Correct the JRF Certificate for Transgender Scholar Rithisha Rithu?

Synopsis

In a landmark ruling, the Kerala High Court has directed the NTA to amend the JRF certificate for transgender scholar Rithisha Rithu, underscoring the importance of recognizing self-identified names. This ruling aims to prevent financial hardships caused by institutional discrepancies.

Key Takeaways

  • The Kerala High Court has instructed the NTA to correct JRF certificates to reflect self-identified names.
  • This ruling is significant for the recognition and rights of transgender individuals in academia.
  • Institutional failures to recognize legal identities can hinder essential funding for research.

Kochi, Nov 14 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court has instructed the National Testing Agency (NTA) to amend the Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) certificate for transgender scholar Rithisha Rithu, ensuring it accurately displays her legally-recognized, self-identified name. This interim order will remain valid until the NTA completes the necessary corrections within two weeks.

Justice V.G. Arun issued this directive following a petition from Rithu, who is recognized as the first transgender woman in Kerala to be admitted to a Ph.D. program.

She sought judicial intervention after her JRF funding was halted due to a discrepancy between the name on her fellowship certificate and her bank account.

The petition asserts that Rithu formally updated her gender identity and name in January 2023, receiving a Form 3 certificate from the District Magistrate under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.

She applied for the UGC-NET examination administered by the NTA in May 2024.

As her academic records and Aadhaar had not yet been updated, she used her previous name in the application while indicating her gender as transgender/third gender.

After passing the exam in December 2024 and gaining admission to a Ph.D. program in Social Work, she opened a bank account under her self-identified name to receive fellowship funds through the UGC’s Scholarship and Fellowship Management Portal (SFMP).

However, her attempt to link this account was declined due to a “beneficiary name mismatch,” which obstructed the release of her fellowship funds.

The petitioner contended that the denial of JRF funds, her sole financial support for research, stemmed from institutional failure to acknowledge her legally updated identity.

She argued that this situation infringed upon her Fundamental Rights under Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution and Sections 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 of the Transgender Persons Act.

Rithu's plea called for the UGC, NTA, and Canara Bank to promptly rectify the records, disburse the fellowship, and grant ₹25,000 as litigation costs.

During the hearing, the Court noted the confusion between the UGC and NTA regarding which agency was accountable for amending the certificate.

Justice Arun clarified that it is the responsibility of the NTA to make the needed corrections.

“The petitioner’s difficulties arise from her lawful change of name and gender. It is incumbent upon the National Testing Agency to implement the correction,” the Court stated, issuing the interim order.

Point of View

I believe this ruling by the Kerala High Court marks a significant step towards inclusivity and recognition of transgender rights in India. It emphasizes the need for institutions to adapt to legal changes regarding identity and gender, ultimately fostering a more equitable environment for all scholars.
NationPress
14/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the significance of the Kerala High Court's ruling?
The ruling emphasizes the need for institutions to acknowledge and correct discrepancies in identity documentation, thereby advancing the rights of transgender individuals.
Who is Rithisha Rithu?
Rithisha Rithu is the first transgender woman in Kerala to gain admission to a Ph.D. program, advocating for recognition of her self-identified name.
What was the reason for the JRF funding blockage?
The funding was blocked due to a name mismatch between Rithu's fellowship certificate and her bank account, stemming from her recent legal name change.
Nation Press