Kerala Minister Sunny Joseph defends brother-in-law's staff appointment
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kerala Minister Sunny Joseph on Friday, 5 June defended the appointment of his brother-in-law, Benny Thomas, to his personal staff, asserting there were no legal impediments to the move and that Thomas brings a substantial political record to the role. The appointment has drawn criticism from within Left circles, who have characterised it as nepotism.
The Minister's Defence
Joseph described Benny Thomas as a seasoned public worker who was elected Ullickal Grama Panchayat President with a record majority. He noted that Thomas had previously served as his chief agent during the Assembly elections and has always openly acknowledged their family relationship.
'Benny Thomas could have been placed in another minister's staff if that was the intention. I am not ready for such hypocrisy,' Joseph said, dismissing suggestions that the appointment was an act of concealed favouritism.
Benny Thomas's Political Background
According to the Minister, Benny Thomas has held several prominent party positions over the years, including roles in Youth Congress, as Congress Ullickal Mandalam President, as DCC General Secretary, and as Ullickal Grama Panchayat President. Joseph argued this track record justified the appointment on merit.
The order appointing 13 members to the Minister's personal staff also included Youth Congress leader Sudeep James, who had previously worked alongside Joseph during his tenure as KPCC president.
Health Minister Backs the Move
Health Minister K. Muraleedharan came out in support, stating that Thomas was well known as a frontline Congress worker. Muraleedharan questioned the basis of the criticism, pointing to past precedents where political leaders had appointed close relatives in similar positions.
'Did anyone raise questions when Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan appointed his son-in-law as a minister? These things have happened before,' Muraleedharan said.
A Pattern of Precedents
The controversy surfaces against a backdrop of similar instances in Kerala politics. There have been earlier cases where ministers appointed relatives on the rolls of another minister's office while those relatives effectively worked with the minister to whom they were related. A previous instance also involved a CPI(M) minister appointing his son's wife to their office. Critics argue these precedents normalise nepotism rather than justify it.
With the opposition sharpening its attack and the ruling side citing past practice as cover, the episode is likely to keep the spotlight on ministerial appointment norms in Kerala in the days ahead.