Priyank Kharge Accuses CBI, IT, ED of Political Manipulation

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Priyank Kharge Accuses CBI, IT, ED of Political Manipulation

Synopsis

Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge denounces the use of central agencies like CBI, IT, and ED as political tools by the BJP, following the discharge of Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia in the Excise Policy case. This raises questions about the integrity of these institutions.

Key Takeaways

Priyank Kharge condemns the political misuse of central agencies.
The CBI, IT, and ED are accused of being wielded as political tools.
The Delhi Court discharged Kejriwal and Sisodia due to lack of evidence.
The importance of fair investigations was highlighted by the court.
Upcoming elections in Gujarat and Punjab are expected to be contentious.

New Delhi, Feb 28 (NationPress) Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge expressed strong disapproval regarding the perceived manipulation of central agencies in light of the Delhi Court’s decision to discharge former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia from the Excise Policy case. He claimed that institutions like the CBI, Income Tax (IT) Department, and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) have been exploited for the BJP's political advantage.

During a press conference, Kharge remarked, “The CBI, IT, and ED are being used as puppets to secure political benefits for the BJP. These agencies have been turned into weapons. Even the Supreme Court has commented on this matter. Where is the chargesheet against Arvind Kejriwal or Manish Sisodia? If you examine the data on IT and ED raids, nearly 98 percent of these cases result in no convictions. Only about 3 to 4 percent lead to any tangible results. These organizations are solely being utilized for political ends.”

Congress MP Pramod Tiwari also weighed in on this issue.

In a statement to IANS, he mentioned, “With elections nearing in Gujarat and Punjab, it is crucial that they are conducted in a free and fair manner. The Bharatiya Janata Party manipulates its resources and personnel to dictate when, where, and against whom to take action. Pawan has already issued a detailed statement on this issue, which I fully support.”

Meanwhile, JD(U) spokesperson Neeraj Kumar called for composure.

He stated, “Arvind Kejriwal has been the Chief Minister of Delhi. The lower court has discharged him and has made judicial observations regarding the case. According to media sources, the CBI intends to appeal to a higher court. Thus, there is no need for excessive excitement or concern at this time. This is merely part of the judicial process.”

Earlier on Friday, Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia were acquitted in the prominent Delhi liquor excise policy case.

The Rouse Avenue Court noted that there was a lack of evidence against the two leaders, providing them with a significant relief.

The court highlighted the necessity of a fair investigation to guarantee a just trial, pointing out that the prosecution had failed to support its claims.

Regarding Sisodia, the court asserted that the accusations made by the CBI lacked substance, no criminal conspiracy was proven, and the prosecution could not establish its case.

This ruling followed the court's reservation of its verdict on February 12, after extensive arguments from both the CBI and the defense.

In addition to Kejriwal and Sisodia, 21 other individuals faced accusations in the case. At the time of the incident, Kejriwal was the serving Chief Minister of Delhi and Sisodia was his deputy.

The CBI initiated its first chargesheet in 2022 and subsequently filed several supplementary chargesheets. The agency alleged that around Rs 100 crore was paid by a “south lobby” to sway the now-defunct excise policy in its favor.

Point of View

The allegations by Priyank Kharge regarding the misuse of central agencies raise significant concerns about the independence of these institutions. The discourse surrounding this issue highlights the ongoing tension between political parties and their influence on judicial processes.
NationPress
8 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the charges against Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia?
Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia were implicated in the Delhi Excise Policy case, which involved allegations of corruption related to the liquor licensing process.
What did Priyank Kharge accuse the CBI, IT, and ED of?
Priyank Kharge accused these agencies of being used for political gains by the BJP, suggesting they have been weaponized against political opponents.
What was the outcome of the Delhi Court's ruling?
The Delhi Court discharged both Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, stating there was no evidence against them.
Why are the upcoming elections in Gujarat and Punjab significant?
These elections are significant as they will test the political landscape and the influence of various parties, particularly the BJP, in these regions.
What did JD(U) spokesperson Neeraj Kumar say about the situation?
Neeraj Kumar urged for restraint and emphasized that the judicial process should be respected following the court's discharge of Kejriwal.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 5 months ago
  4. 5 months ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 12 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google