Is Muridke the New Nerve Center of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Operation Sindoor has significantly disrupted terrorist operations in Pakistan.
- The ISI is strategizing to centralize terror groups for better coordination.
- New facilities are being established away from previous targets to evade Indian strikes.
- Intelligence efforts are critical in monitoring the activities of these groups.
- Fundraising under false pretenses is a tactic being employed to support these operations.
New Delhi, Sep 15 (NationPress) Following a strong offensive by the Indian armed forces, terrorist factions within Pakistan have experienced considerable losses. The recent Operation Sindoor targeted and dismantled crucial terror training camps and headquarters belonging to Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and Hizbul Mujahideen in retaliation for the devastating Pahalgam attacks.
Key locations such as Muridke and Bahawalpur were significantly impacted, with the latter being a central hub for both Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed. Reports indicate that despite attempts to rebuild terror training facilities at Muridke, intelligence agencies believe this may serve as a facade. Construction is indeed underway at Muridke, allegedly financed by the Pakistan establishment.
However, it appears likely that Lashkar-e-Taiba may not fully operate from this site, instead concentrating its activities around Bahawalpur, located about 400 km from Muridke.
Post-Operation Sindoor, intelligence reports suggested that terrorist assets in Pakistan would be relocated closer to Pakistan Army bases to evade detection and avoid future strikes by Indian forces.
The Indian military, aided by intelligence efforts, possesses detailed knowledge of the critical facilities in Muridke, Bahawalpur, and Balakot, all of which have been targeted successfully. Consequently, Pakistan is seeking to establish new facilities that remain undetected by Indian surveillance.
Former Research and Analysis Wing officer Amar Bhushan informed IANS that these facilities have long been on the radar of Indian agencies, meticulously mapped over the years. The destruction of these sites was essential, and it has finally been executed.
Although reconstruction at Muridke is ongoing, it will likely not be utilized as extensively by Lashkar-e-Taiba as in the past. Even if a strike were to occur, it would inflict minimal damage on the group. This rebuilding effort, while seemingly risky, serves to convey a message of resilience and boost morale among Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives who have been demoralized by recent Indian operations.
In reality, the ISI prefers both Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba to operate from a common location, facilitating coordination and collaborative strikes against India.
The initial indication of Lashkar-e-Taiba relocating surfaced when its proxy group, The Resistance Front, was instructed to shift operations to Bahawalpur.
Following Operation Sindoor, the ISI mandated that all its terror factions operate from a single site for easier management. This centralization allows for quick eradication in the event of future Indian strikes, improving operational coordination and reducing the number of targets needing protection. Furthermore, the ISI is keen on minimizing terror facilities in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), relocating them deeper into Pakistan and closer to military installations, which serve as a protective barrier. This strategy reflects Pakistan's belief that India would hesitate to strike military sites, viewing such actions as acts of war.
Currently, India is intensifying its efforts to gather intelligence on the financial expenditures made by Pakistan for establishing these terror infrastructures. Such information will be crucial in building a case against Islamabad at the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), potentially revealing that Pakistan is misusing bailout funds from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Indian agencies are also scrutinizing fundraising activities that contribute to the reconstruction of terror facilities, noting that funds collected under the guise of flood relief are being redirected towards these operations.