Did JP Nadda Accuse Congress of Collusion in the 2013 Jhiram Ghati Maoist Attack?
Synopsis
In a dramatic turn of events, JP Nadda's allegations against Congress regarding the 2013 Jhiram Ghati Maoist attack have ignited heated political exchanges. With both parties entangled in a fierce war of words, the implications of these claims could resonate deeply in Chhattisgarh's political landscape.
Key Takeaways
JP Nadda's allegations revive discussions on the Jhiram Ghati attack.
Congress leaders strongly reject the accusations.
The incident remains a pivotal moment in Chhattisgarh's political history.
The government's achievements are highlighted amidst the controversy.
The ongoing debate reflects broader political tensions in India.
Raipur, Dec 22 (NationPress) The political landscape of Chhattisgarh ignited a new controversy on Monday when BJP National President and Union Health Minister JP Nadda claimed there was internal Congress collusion in the devastating 2013 Jhiram Ghati Maoist attack, which claimed the lives of the party's top state leaders.
This accusation, made during the 'Janadesh Parab' event marking two years of the Vishnu Deo Sai government, sparked intense backlash from Congress officials, including former Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel.
Speaking to a large crowd at Khokhra Police Ground in Janjgir-Champa, Nadda alleged that information regarding the movement of Congress leaders was leaked from within, facilitating the ambush that resulted in the deaths of prominent figures like Nand Kumar Patel and Mahendra Karma.
He accused the Congress party of having a historical connection to extremists, while asserting that the current 'double-engine' government is committed to eradicating Maoism by March 2026.
On May 25, 2013, an ambush was executed against a convoy of Congress leaders during their 'Parivartan Rally' ahead of assembly elections in the Jhiram valley, resulting in the deaths of 32 individuals, including then-state Congress chief Nand Kumar Patel, former Leader of Opposition Mahendra Karma, and former Union Minister Vidyacharan Shukla.
Responding to Nadda's claim, Chhattisgarh Congress President Deepak Baij labeled the statements as 'factually incorrect and highly insensitive', pointing out that the BJP was in power in 2013 and allegedly ignored critical intelligence warnings.
He urged for public questioning of the surrendered Maoists to uncover the truth.
Former Chief Minister Baghel escalated his criticism, calling Nadda a 'puppet' and accusing him of dishonoring the memory of the martyrs.
In a strongly worded post on X, Baghel stated, 'JP Nadda has once again come to Chhattisgarh and demeaned the sacrifice of those who died in Jhiram. Security agencies, including NIA, should interrogate him and seek evidence for his allegations. We lost our leaders in the Naxal attack—calling it collusion is an affront to their martyrdom.'
Baghel raised critical questions, 'When the Congress government sought to identify conspirators, why did the BJP obstruct probes through court petitions? Now that the alleged attackers are in custody, will they be questioned about the conspiracy?'
He attributed his government's strategies to diminishing Naxalism, questioning why the BJP's 15-year rule failed to eradicate it, despite 700 villages being abandoned and tribal communities facing violence, while then-CM Raman Singh allegedly instructed security advisor KPS Gill to 'take salary and relax'.
Amid this controversy, the event highlighted the government's accomplishments: an increase from one to 11 medical colleges (with four more set to open, including in Janjgir-Champa and Dantewada); the Mahtari Vandan Yojana which supports 70 lakh women through monthly transfers of Rs 1,000; the forthcoming Mahtari Sadan aimed at self-reliance; and 1,985 homes constructed under welfare programs.
Nadda expressed gratitude to voters for rejecting Congress's 'corruption and misgovernance' in 2023, praising the developmental achievements under PM Modi and Home Minister Shah.
Point of View
The recent allegations made by JP Nadda reflect ongoing tensions within India's political landscape. It highlights the need for accountability and transparency, especially regarding serious incidents like the Jhiram Ghati attack. As the debate continues, it is essential to focus on facts and ensure that political discourse remains respectful and constructive.
NationPress
11 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Jhiram Ghati Maoist attack?
The Jhiram Ghati Maoist attack occurred on May 25, 2013, when Maoists ambushed a convoy of Congress leaders, resulting in the deaths of 32 individuals, including significant party figures.
What did JP Nadda accuse Congress of?
JP Nadda accused Congress of internal collusion aiding the Maoist ambush during the 2013 attack, suggesting that leadership movements were leaked from within the party.
How did Congress respond to Nadda's allegations?
Congress leaders, including Bhupesh Baghel, labeled Nadda's comments as factually incorrect and insensitive, demanding accountability from the BJP for its governance during that period.
What measures has the current government taken against Maoism?
The current 'double-engine' government, led by BJP, claims to be committed to eradicating Maoism by March 2026, emphasizing developmental programs and security measures.
What are some recent achievements of the Chhattisgarh government?
Recent achievements include the expansion of medical colleges in the state, financial support for women through the Mahtari Vandan Yojana, and the construction of numerous homes under welfare schemes.
