Could Jagadguru Rambhadracharya Face Jail Time Under a Properly Implemented Constitution?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
A political firestorm ignites as Congress leader Udit Raj claims Jagadguru Rambhadracharya would face jail time if the Constitution were properly enforced. This controversy revolves around the spiritual leader’s remarks on caste-based reservation and Sonia Gandhi's identity, escalating tensions among political factions.
Key Takeaways
- Udit Raj's comments highlight political tensions regarding caste and reservation policies.
- Rambhadracharya's remarks have sparked a significant backlash from various parties.
- The discourse around identity and heritage remains sensitive in Indian politics.
- Political leaders stress the importance of constitutional rights for marginalized groups.
New Delhi, Nov 25 (NationPress) A significant political uproar unfolded on Tuesday when Congress figure Udit Raj delivered a sharp critique of Jagadguru Rambhadracharya, asserting that the spiritual authority would “be in jail” if the Constitution were enforced accurately. His statements have intensified the already heated political debate surrounding Rambhadracharya’s recent remarks about the SC/ST Act, caste-based reservation, and prominent Congress leader Sonia Gandhi.
In a robust response to the spiritual leader’s comments, Udit Raj stated, “There is no Parliament in the Vedas, no Prime Minister, no Chief Minister… This man is foolish. What should I even say on this?”
He also reacted to Purnia MP Pappu Yadav’s earlier assertion that Rambhadracharya required the ideology of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar for reform. Udit Raj concurred, claiming, “That is the only cure for him. If the Constitution is fully implemented today, Ramabhadracharaya will be inside jail.”
The controversy deepened as Udit Raj countered Rambhadracharya’s remarks regarding Sonia Gandhi's Indian identity. The seer had previously claimed, “She is not Indian..., as she is the wife of our Indian son Rajiv ji, but there is no Indian inside her.”
Udit Raj retorted, “He himself is of foreign origin; first, he should get his DNA tested and then check Sonia Gandhi’s DNA.”
Rambhadracharya’s comments have stirred widespread reactions from various political factions. He has called for the repeal of caste-based protections under the SC/ST Act, stating, “The SC/ST Act should be repealed… I would say that there should be no reservation based on caste.”
This remark has faced significant political backlash, with Congress leader Sandeep Dikshit and MP Pappu Yadav denouncing it.
Dikshit responded decisively, questioning the practicality of Rambhadracharya’s demands: “Win a two-thirds majority, come to Parliament, form the government and change the laws. Or do you think PM Modi will listen to you just because you are part of his group? Then you can ask your ministers to remove the reservation...”
Dikshit’s remarks highlight the political sensitivities surrounding reservation policies and the legislative frameworks that safeguard marginalized communities.
Point of View
This incident highlights the volatile intersection of politics and social justice in India. The robust responses from various political figures reflect ongoing tensions surrounding caste-based policies and the importance of constitutional rights for marginalized communities. It is crucial for political discourse to remain respectful and constructive in addressing these sensitive issues.
NationPress
25/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Udit Raj say about Rambhadracharya?
Udit Raj claimed that Jagadguru Rambhadracharya would be in jail if the Constitution were enforced correctly, criticizing his views on caste and reservation.
How did Udit Raj respond to Rambhadracharya's comments on Sonia Gandhi?
Udit Raj countered Rambhadracharya by questioning his own heritage and suggesting he should undergo DNA testing before making claims about Sonia Gandhi's identity.
What is the significance of Rambhadracharya's remarks on the SC/ST Act?
His call to repeal the SC/ST Act and eliminate caste-based reservations has sparked significant political backlash and raised concerns over the protection of marginalized communities.
What was the reaction from other political leaders?
Leaders like Sandeep Dikshit criticized Rambhadracharya's demands, emphasizing the need for a legitimate political process to change laws related to reservations.
