Why Did Rahul Gandhi Approach Jharkhand HC to Quash Non-Bailable Warrant?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal move, Congress MP Rahul Gandhi seeks to quash a Non-Bailable Warrant issued by the Chaibasa court. This warrant stems from a 2018 case involving alleged derogatory remarks about Amit Shah. Can he navigate the legal waters and emerge unscathed? Read more for the full story.
Key Takeaways
- Rahul Gandhi challenges a Non-Bailable Warrant in Jharkhand High Court.
- The warrant is linked to remarks about Amit Shah from 2018.
- Legal counsel argues the warrant is premature.
- The case exemplifies the intersection of law and politics in India.
- Gandhi's political future may hinge on the outcome of this case.
Ranchi, June 2 (NationPress) - Rahul Gandhi, the Congress MP and Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha, has petitioned the Jharkhand High Court to annul a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against him by the special court for MPs and MLAs in Chaibasa. This warrant relates to a case from 2018 regarding alleged offensive comments made about former BJP National President Amit Shah.
The NBW was issued on May 22 after LoP Rahul Gandhi did not respond to previous court summons. The Chaibasa court has mandated his personal appearance on June 26.
Gandhi's legal representatives argue in the High Court that a petition submitted under Section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which requests exemption from personal attendance, remains unresolved in the same court. Thus, they claim that the issuance of the NBW is premature and legally unjustifiable while the exemption request is still pending.
The controversy originated from a complaint lodged by Pratap Katiyar from Chaibasa on July 9, 2018. The complaint alleges that Gandhi made a remark during a Congress session stating, "No murderer can become the national president in the Congress. Congressmen cannot accept a murderer as the national president -- this is possible only in the BJP," which was interpreted as a subtle jab at Amit Shah.
Initially, the Chaibasa court issued a bailable warrant in April 2022, but LoP Gandhi reportedly did not respond to the summons.
In February 2024, the NBW was issued, leading his legal team to seek an exemption from personal appearance, which the trial court denied.
Subsequently, Rahul Gandhi approached the Jharkhand High Court, which provided him with temporary relief. However, with the situation still unresolved, the recent NBW prompted the LoP to submit a new petition in the High Court.
Point of View
It is essential to maintain an unbiased perspective on the ongoing legal situation surrounding Rahul Gandhi. His efforts to challenge the Non-Bailable Warrant reflect the complexities of political discourse in India, particularly in relation to the legal ramifications of public statements made by political figures. It is crucial that we adhere to impartial reporting while acknowledging the significance of the case in shaping political narratives.
NationPress
27/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the reason behind the Non-Bailable Warrant against Rahul Gandhi?
The Non-Bailable Warrant was issued in connection with alleged derogatory comments made by Rahul Gandhi about Amit Shah during a Congress session in 2018.
What steps has Rahul Gandhi taken regarding the warrant?
Rahul Gandhi has approached the Jharkhand High Court to seek the cancellation of the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against him.
What was the initial legal action taken by the Chaibasa court?
Initially, the Chaibasa court issued a bailable warrant in April 2022, which was later upgraded to a Non-Bailable Warrant due to Gandhi's lack of response to court summons.
What is Section 205 of the CrPC?
Section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Code allows for an exemption from personal appearance in court under certain circumstances.
What is the significance of this case in Indian politics?
This case underscores the tensions between political figures and the legal consequences of public statements, highlighting the intricate relationship between law and politics in India.
