Anbumani Ramadoss slams DMK over 20,000 illegal liquor outlets in Tamil Nadu
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) leader Anbumani Ramadoss on Tuesday, 28 April launched a sharp attack on the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government led by Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, alleging that administrative inaction has allowed more than 20,000 illegal liquor outlets to operate across Tamil Nadu — nearly four times the number of legal TASMAC shops in the state. Ramadoss made the remarks in the context of a recent incident in Podur village near Bennenagaram in Dharmapuri district, where a group of women allegedly ransacked four illicit liquor outlets.
The Podur Incident
According to Ramadoss, the four illegal outlets in Podur had not sprung up overnight — they had reportedly been functioning for several years despite repeated protests by local residents demanding their closure. The main accused in the illicit trade, identified as Govindan, reportedly escaped during the incident. While Ramadoss acknowledged that taking the law into one's own hands is not an acceptable solution, he described the women's action as a direct consequence of administrative failure by the state government.
Scale of the Problem
Ramadoss claimed that while 4,787 TASMAC shops function legally across Tamil Nadu, more than 20,000 illegal liquor outlets are operating in parallel — many of them round the clock across Dharmapuri district and beyond. He alleged that this unchecked proliferation has not only devastated poor and middle-class families but has also resulted in massive revenue losses and corruption, estimated at over ₹50,000 crore annually due to evasion of excise duties and taxes.
Political and Legislative Failures, Ramadoss Alleges
The PMK leader pointed out that his party had organised multiple protests seeking the removal of such outlets, and that Dharmapuri MLA S.P. Venkateshwaran had raised the issue on the floor of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. Despite these efforts, Ramadoss alleged that the state government not only failed to act but also indulged in what he called