Is RCB Being Unfairly Blamed for the Stampede?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a controversial legal battle, the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) challenges the Central Administrative Tribunal's remarks linking it to a tragic stampede. With 11 lives lost, the stakes are high as RCB argues for justice against claims that they attracted massive crowds without police consent. What does this mean for the future of the franchise?
Key Takeaways
- RCB challenges CAT's remarks.
- Stampede resulted in 11 fatalities.
- Claims of unfair blame without RCB's input.
- Upcoming hearing on July 17.
- Legal implications for social media use.
Bengaluru, July 9 (NationPress) The Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) has taken legal action against the Karnataka High Court, contesting the comments made by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), which implicated the cricket franchise in attracting large crowds that allegedly contributed to the tragic stampede on June 4, resulting in the deaths of 11 individuals.
The Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited (RCSPL), the organization behind RCB, submitted the petition on Wednesday.
The CAT made these remarks while overturning the suspension of senior IPS officer Vikash Kumar Vikash, imposed by the Karnataka government in relation to the stampede incident.
The petition asserts that the CAT's statements contradict principles of natural justice and emphasizes that RCB was not involved in the proceedings yet faced unwarranted scrutiny.
Additionally, it argues that the CAT exceeded its authority by assigning blame without considering RCB's perspective.
The petition further claims that the CAT's remarks are both factually and legally flawed, issued prior to the completion of investigations by multiple agencies, including a magisterial inquiry into the stampede.
The Bengaluru bench of the CAT had annulled the suspension of Inspector General of Police-rank officer Vikash Kumar Vikash, tied to the June 4 stampede at a cricket stadium, which led to the untimely deaths of 11 RCB fans who had gathered to celebrate the team’s IPL victory on July 1.
The tribunal, consisting of Justice B. K. Shrivastava and Santhosh Mehra, expressed that RCB had made social media posts without the requisite approval from local police authorities.
The bench highlighted that the first of these posts garnered 1.6 million views, the second 426,000 views, the third 760,000 views, and the fourth reached 1.7 million views.
Thus, it seems that RCB's actions might have contributed to a crowd of approximately 300,000 to 500,000 people.
The bench noted, “RCB did not secure the necessary permissions or consent from the police,” during their deliberations.
Meanwhile, the bench has postponed the hearing regarding the Karnataka government's appeal against the CAT's decision to July 17.
Point of View
It is crucial to highlight the importance of fairness in the judicial process. The RCB's challenge against the CAT underscores the need for thorough investigations before placing blame. As we follow this story, our commitment remains to provide balanced coverage, ensuring that all voices are heard in this matter.
NationPress
24/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the RCB's legal stance regarding the stampede?
The RCB contends that the Central Administrative Tribunal's remarks were unjust and made without their input, violating natural justice principles.
How many people died in the stampede?
The tragic stampede resulted in the loss of 11 lives.
What were the CAT's observations about RCB's social media posts?
The CAT noted that RCB's social media posts attracted substantial views and contributed to a large crowd without securing necessary police permissions.
When is the next hearing in this case?
The hearing for the Karnataka government's challenge against the CAT's decision is scheduled for July 17.
What is the significance of the RCB's petition?
The petition aims to clarify RCB's lack of involvement in the proceedings and seek justice against potentially incorrect allegations.
