Is Robert Vadra In Trouble Over London Property Deals Linked to Sanjay Bhandari?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Robert Vadra interrogated by the ED over London property deals.
- Allegations include money laundering linked to Sanjay Bhandari.
- Properties considered proceeds of crime since 2016.
- Bhandari declared a fugitive economic offender.
- Investigation raises questions about political accountability.
New Delhi, July 14 (NationPress) Robert Vadra, the spouse of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, faced interrogation by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Monday regarding alleged money laundering associated with two properties in London. Vadra, who has consistently denied any misconduct, exited the federal agency's office after approximately two hours.
After the questioning, Vadra opted not to comment to the media. In previous statements, he has criticized the ED for pursuing him and insisted he has nothing to conceal.
The ED claims that the properties in question are benami assets linked to Vadra, allegedly acquired in collaboration with UK-based arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari.
The two properties being scrutinized are located at Grosvenor Hill Court, 13 Bourdon Street, and 19 Bryanston Square. The ED considers these assets as proceeds of crime associated with a money laundering case filed in 2016.
According to the ED, Vadra reportedly resided at the Bryanston Square property during several visits to London.
The investigation into these properties gained traction after authorities detected possible benami transactions between Vadra and Bhandari.
The agency has also alleged that Bhandari made renovations to one of the London properties in 2009 using funds from Vadra.
On July 5, a Delhi Court declared Bhandari a fugitive economic offender, following a British court's refusal to extradite him to India.
Having fled to the UK in 2016, Bhandari was designated a fugitive under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018, allowing the investigation agency to seize his assets.
The ED filed a chargesheet against Bhandari in 2020 based on actions initiated by the Income Tax department under anti-money laundering legislation.
He is accused of hiding foreign assets, making false declarations to suppress information, and using backdated documents.