Why Was a Punjab Sarpanch Denied Entry at PM Modi's Event?

Click to start listening
Why Was a Punjab Sarpanch Denied Entry at PM Modi's Event?

Synopsis

A Punjab sarpanch facing denial of entry to PM Modi's Independence Day event due to carrying a sacred ‘kripan’ has raised eyebrows. With BJP leader R.P. Singh voicing strong support, this incident highlights significant constitutional rights issues and discussions around religious freedoms. What does this mean for the Sikh community and the Delhi Police?

Key Takeaways

  • Sarpanch Gurdhyan Singh faced entry denial despite a valid invitation.
  • The ‘kripan’ is constitutionally protected under Article 25.
  • BJP leader R.P. Singh condemned the incident as a constitutional rights violation.
  • Delhi Police assured an investigation into the matter.
  • Stricter guidelines may be implemented to protect religious rights.

New Delhi, Aug 18 (NationPress) A Punjab sarpanch, who was barred from attending Prime Minister Narendra Modi's event at the Red Fort on Independence Day due to carrying the sacred ‘kripan’, received support on Monday from Sikh BJP leader R.P. Singh, who labeled the incident a “violation of constitutional rights.”

The BJP National Spokesperson advocated for Sarpanch Sardar Gurdhyan Singh from village Kalsana (Nabha, Punjab), expressing disappointment that he was prevented from participating in the Independence Day celebration, despite holding a valid official invitation (Letter No. 499 issued by the Government of India).

On Monday, R.P. Singh, a former Delhi MLA, met with Madhur Verma, Joint Commissioner of Police (Central Range), Delhi, to file a formal complaint against ACP Shashi Kant Gaur, who allegedly obstructed the village headman from accessing the seating area.

In his complaint, R.P. Singh emphasized that the Sarpanch was denied entry solely because he carried the Sri Sahib (Kirpan), a revered symbol of Sikh faith that is an integral part of Sikh identity and constitutionally protected under Article 25.

He asserted that this represented a violation of constitutional rights, as confirmed by the Supreme Court in the case of Balwant Singh versus State of Rajasthan (2006), and was both an affront to the Sikh community and a neglect of duty, tarnishing the reputation of the Delhi Police.

During the meeting, Joint CP Madhur Verma communicated with Sarpanch Gurdhyan Singh via video call and expressed regret over the incident.

Verma assured that an investigation will take place regarding this matter. He also invited the Sarpanch for a personal meeting, reaffirming goodwill and respect.

Following his discussion with the Joint CP, R.P. Singh welcomed the response from the Delhi Police leadership while underscoring that stringent directives should be implemented to avert the recurrence of such breaches of constitutional and religious rights of the Sikh community.

Point of View

This incident underscores the importance of upholding constitutional rights. It reflects broader societal issues regarding religious freedoms and the responsibilities of law enforcement in ensuring these rights are respected. As a nation, we must always strive to uphold the principles of inclusivity and respect for diverse cultural identities.
NationPress
19/08/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened to the Punjab sarpanch at PM Modi's event?
The Punjab sarpanch was denied entry at the event for carrying a sacred ‘kripan’, despite having a valid invitation.
Who supported the sarpanch in this incident?
Sikh BJP leader R.P. Singh publicly supported the sarpanch, describing the situation as a violation of constitutional rights.
What does the ‘kripan’ symbolize in Sikh culture?
The ‘kripan’ is a sacred symbol of the Sikh faith, representing courage and is constitutionally protected under Article 25.
What action did R.P. Singh take regarding this incident?
R.P. Singh met with the Joint Commissioner of Police to file a formal complaint against the officer who denied the sarpanch entry.
What was the response of the Delhi Police regarding this incident?
The Joint CP expressed regret over the incident and assured that an enquiry would be conducted.