Did the SC Ignore Allegations of Custodial Torture and Sexual Assault of a Minor in Gujarat’s Botad?

Click to start listening
Did the SC Ignore Allegations of Custodial Torture and Sexual Assault of a Minor in Gujarat’s Botad?

Synopsis

In a shocking turn of events, the Supreme Court has declined to address a petition regarding the alleged custodial torture and sexual assault of a minor in Gujarat. This raises significant questions about the protection of minors in police custody and the judicial response to such grave allegations.

Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court refused to entertain the petition.
  • Allegations include custodial torture and sexual assault.
  • Minor currently in ICU due to alleged abuse.
  • Petitioner advised to approach Gujarat High Court.
  • Case highlights the need for protection of minors' rights.

New Delhi, Sep 15 (NationPress) The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition that claimed custodial torture and sexual assault of a 17-year-old boy by officials of the Botad Town Police Station in Gujarat.

A panel of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta inquired why the minor’s sister should not seek relief from the Gujarat High Court through a writ petition.

When the counsel mentioned that one of the requests was for AIIMS Delhi to examine the boy and provide a report to the Supreme Court regarding the nature and extent of his injuries, the bench responded, "Couldn't the (Gujarat) High Court have issued such an order?"

The apex court was not convinced by the argument that the petition had nationwide ramifications concerning minors being taken into custody and tortured by police.

"How many instances have you referenced in your petition?" the court questioned the counsel for the petitioner.

After this, the counsel requested to withdraw the petition.

"The petitioner is granted permission to withdraw this petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, with the right to approach the appropriate High Court for suitable remedies," the bench ruled.

Last week, Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai ordered the matter to be listed for hearing on Monday (September 15) after it was brought up for urgent consideration. According to the writ petition submitted by the minor’s sister, the boy was taken into custody by the police on August 19 over theft allegations involving gold and cash. Instead of being presented before the Juvenile Justice Board or a magistrate within 24 hours, he was unlawfully detained and tortured for nearly ten days, the petition alleged.

"While in illegal custody, the petitioner’s brother faced severe beatings from four to six police officers at the Botad Town Police Station and was subjected to sexual assault through the insertion of sticks into his anus," the petition revealed.

Furthermore, the plea indicated that the police neglected to conduct a required medical examination and coerced family members into signing false statements claiming the child had fallen off a bicycle.

The boy was subsequently admitted to Zydus Hospital in Ahmedabad, where he remains in the ICU undergoing dialysis due to kidney damage allegedly inflicted by the custodial abuse. He has also experienced temporary blindness, seizures, and bowel incontinence.

The petition characterized his condition as a severe infringement of fundamental rights, including the right to live with dignity, personal liberty, and life. The plea requested the establishment of a court-monitored Special Investigation Team (SIT) or, alternatively, an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) under the supervision of the Supreme Court.

Point of View

I must emphasize the importance of thorough investigations in cases involving minors and allegations of police misconduct. The Supreme Court's decision to direct the petitioner to approach the High Court does not diminish the seriousness of these claims. The rights of individuals, especially vulnerable minors, must always be upheld and protected.
NationPress
16/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding the petition?
The Supreme Court refused to entertain the petition alleging custodial torture and sexual assault of a minor, suggesting the petitioner should approach the Gujarat High Court.
What were the allegations against the police?
The allegations included that the minor was illegally detained, tortured, and sexually assaulted by police officers while in custody.
What is the current condition of the minor?
The minor is currently in the ICU at Zydus Hospital in Ahmedabad, undergoing dialysis due to kidney damage from the alleged abuse.
What legal actions were suggested by the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with the liberty to approach the appropriate High Court for remedies.
What fundamental rights are at stake in this case?
The case raises serious concerns regarding the violation of fundamental rights, including the right to live with dignity, personal liberty, and life.