Did the Supreme Court Criticize Delhi Police for Delays in 2020 Delhi Riots Bail Petitions?

Click to start listening
Did the Supreme Court Criticize Delhi Police for Delays in 2020 Delhi Riots Bail Petitions?

Synopsis

The Supreme Court has taken a firm stance against the Delhi Police for delays in filing responses to bail petitions from student activists involved in the 2020 Delhi riots. As tensions rise, the court urges timely action, emphasizing the need for justice for the accused who have languished in jail for over five years.

Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court reprimands Delhi Police for delays.
  • Activists have spent over five years in jail.
  • Hearing scheduled for Friday.
  • Concerns over the right to a timely trial.
  • Case revolves around the 2020 Delhi riots.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (NationPress) The Supreme Court on Monday admonished the Delhi Police for requesting extra time to submit its counter-affidavit regarding the bail petitions from student activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Meeran Haider, Gulfisha Fatima, and Shifa-ur-Rehman. These individuals are implicated in the 2020 Delhi riots, which are categorized as a 'larger conspiracy' case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

A bench consisting of Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria emphasized that this matter should not face any further delays and scheduled a hearing for Friday. They instructed the Delhi Police to file their counter-affidavits in the interim.

Initially, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S.V. Raju, representing the Delhi Police, requested a two-week extension to file a response. However, the Justice Kumar-led bench declined the request, asserting that ample time had already been allocated.

“We have provided sufficient time. You may be appearing for the first time. Previously, we mentioned in open court that we would hear this matter on October 27 and resolve it,” the apex court stated.

When ASG Raju requested at least one week, the Justice Kumar-led bench remained unswayed. “What is the rationale for a counter-affidavit in a bail case?” the court inquired.

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the petitioners, opposed the request for adjournment, pointing out that the accused have already spent over five years imprisoned without trial.

“When delays are in question, there can be no further postponement,” Singhvi contended.

“The petitioners have been incarcerated for over five years,” Sibal added, urging the apex court to proceed with the hearing.

Justice Kumar responded, “Mr. Raju, consider if you can come up with a resolution... after all, it concerns bail... five years have passed,” Justice Kumar remarked.

“Let me review it, but sometimes appearances can be misleading,” ASG Raju replied.

The Supreme Court subsequently scheduled the matter for Friday.

The petitioners are contesting the Delhi High Court's ruling to deny them bail, which indicated there was prima facie evidence suggesting a conspiracy behind the 2020 riots.

The Supreme Court had issued a notice to the Delhi Police on September 22. The February 2020 Delhi riots, which erupted during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), resulted in 53 fatalities and left over 700 individuals injured.

Point of View

It is imperative to recognize the judiciary's role in ensuring justice is served without unnecessary delays. The Supreme Court’s insistence on timely responses from the Delhi Police reaffirms our commitment to uphold the rule of law and protect the rights of individuals, especially those who have faced prolonged incarceration without trial.
NationPress
28/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the 2020 Delhi riots?
The 2020 Delhi riots were violent clashes that occurred in February 2020, primarily during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), resulting in 53 deaths and over 700 injuries.
What is the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)?
The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) is an Indian law aimed at preventing unlawful activities and associations, often invoked in cases related to terrorism and organized crime.
Who are the accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case?
The accused include student activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Meeran Haider, Gulfisha Fatima, and Shifa-ur-Rehman, all of whom have been charged under UAPA for their alleged roles in the riots.
What is the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling?
The Supreme Court's ruling emphasizes the need for timely justice and could potentially impact the legal proceedings related to the bail of the accused activists.
How long have the accused been in jail?
The accused have been in prison for over five years without a trial, raising concerns regarding their right to a fair and timely legal process.
Nation Press