Will Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and ADGP Appear for Tiruppurakundram Contempt Case on December 17?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal development, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has summoned the Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and ADGP to address a contempt case regarding the Karthigai Deepam lighting. The case raises questions on compliance with court orders amidst ongoing government appeals.
Key Takeaways
- Madras High Court demands state officials to explain non-compliance.
- Contempt petition arises from refusal to implement court's order.
- Tamil Nadu government cites law and order concerns.
- Next hearing scheduled for December 17.
- Significant implications for religious practices and governance.
Chennai, Dec 9 (NationPress) The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has mandated that the Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP) attend via video conference on December 17 regarding a contempt of court case associated with the lighting of Karthigai Deepam on top of the Thiruparankundram hill.
The order was issued by Justice G. R. Swaminathan while addressing a contempt petition filed due to the failure to comply with his previous directive regarding the lighting of the ceremonial lamp at the Deebathun Pillar during the recent Karthigai Deepam festival.
Disputes arose when the Tamil Nadu government, led by the DMK, refused to enforce the single judge’s order, citing concerns about law and order.
In response, Ram Ravikumar, founder of the Hindu Tamil Party, lodged a contempt petition against the Madurai District Collector, the Police Commissioner, and the temple's Executive Officer for neglecting to act on the court's directives.
Previously, the state government had appealed to the Supreme Court of India, challenging the single judge’s ruling, but the appeal has yet to be scheduled for a hearing.
During the recent hearing, Additional Advocate General Ravindran, along with senior advocates Veerakathiravan and Vikas Singh, represented the state. They argued that since the case is pending before the Supreme Court, the High Court should defer its decision until the appeal is resolved.
The state maintained that the appeal questions the validity of the order and raised concerns about how interim compliance could be enforced amidst legal challenges. They further contended that mandating temple-related actions could not be done arbitrarily due to serious law and order implications.
Justice Swaminathan dismissed the adjournment request, emphasizing that the core issue was the non-implementation of the prior order. He reiterated that both the Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and the ADGP must attend the video conference on December 17.
The judge also ordered the Union Home Ministry to be included as a respondent in this matter.
Moreover, the Madurai Deputy Police Commissioner was instructed to provide a detailed report explaining the measures taken and the reasons behind the non-compliance with the original court order.
The next hearing of this case is anticipated for the following week.
Point of View
This development highlights the complexities of legal compliance versus governmental authority. The court's insistence on accountability is crucial, especially when public sentiment and religious practices intersect with state concerns over law and order. The situation warrants close observation as it unfolds, reflecting broader themes of governance, judiciary power, and community rights.
NationPress
10/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Karthigai Deepam festival?
Karthigai Deepam is a Hindu festival celebrated in Tamil Nadu, marked by lighting lamps and deepams on the full moon day in the month of Karthigai.
What is the significance of the Thiruparankundram hill?
Thiruparankundram hill is a revered pilgrimage site in Tamil Nadu, associated with Lord Murugan and is known for its ancient temple.
What was the court's initial directive?
The court initially directed the lighting of a ceremonial lamp at the Deebathun Pillar during the Karthigai Deepam festival.
What is the government's position regarding the court's order?
The Tamil Nadu government has cited law and order concerns as reasons for not implementing the court's order.
What are the next steps in this legal case?
The case is expected to be heard again next week, with the Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary and ADGP required to provide explanations for non-compliance.
