Is the Ban on Caste-Based Rallies Justified? UP Minister Sanjay Nishad Thinks Not
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Uttar Pradesh Minister Sanjay Nishad challenges the recent ban on caste-based rallies, arguing it undermines democratic rights. He plans to advocate for a review of the decision, stressing the need for marginalized communities to voice their concerns. Nishad highlights the importance of caste references in ensuring justice and equitable distribution of government benefits.
Key Takeaways
- Minister Sanjay Nishad opposes the ban on caste-based rallies.
- The ban aims to promote social harmony but could silence marginalized voices.
- The decision may impact the ongoing caste census.
- Nishad emphasizes the need for justice and representation in democracy.
- The importance of caste references in governance is highlighted.
New Delhi, Sep 24 (NationPress) The Minister of Uttar Pradesh and head of the Nishad Party, Sanjay Nishad, has voiced his dissent against the state government's recent decision to prohibit caste-based rallies and the inclusion of caste references in official documents. Describing the action as "not right", Nishad expressed his intention to reach out to the government, advocating for a reconsideration of this move.
"This decision is not right. The government should reassess it, and I will draft a letter to them," Nishad informed IANS, who holds the position of Minister for Fisheries in the Uttar Pradesh administration.
In alignment with a recent ruling from the Allahabad High Court, the Uttar Pradesh government has released orders prohibiting caste-based rallies statewide. This decision also requires the elimination of caste references from public spaces, police FIRs, arrest memos, and governmental records. The Chief Secretary has instructed all departments to adhere strictly to the court’s verdict.
While Nishad acknowledged the court's aim to maintain social harmony, he stressed that a total ban could stifle the democratic rights of marginalized groups.
"If the court has issued this directive, it is the responsibility of all to respect it. However, if the objective is to silence the voices of communities that have endured historical injustices, then a review is essential," he stated.
"These groups were designated as criminal castes due to their identity. They were displaced because of their caste. Now, if they are unable to even organize or seek justice, how will they ever secure their rightful place in democracy?"
Nishad referenced findings from the Social Justice Committee, which highlighted inequalities in the allocation of government benefits among OBC sub-castes.
"The Milkman secured 27 percent, the Leatherman obtained 23 percent. What about the others? If communities do not come together and voice their concerns, how will they claim their fair share?" Nishad questioned.
He also expressed worry regarding the ongoing caste census and queried how caste-based certificates for SC, ST, and OBC groups would operate if caste identities are entirely removed from public records.
"The Constitution allows for caste certification. How can you eliminate caste from documents? This issue transcends mere identity; it is fundamentally about justice. If individuals face job scarcity due to their caste, how will they endure?"
Nishad concluded by reaffirming his dedication to addressing the matter at the highest levels: "I will certainly engage with the government. I will also compose a letter, as this decision impacts the rights and dignity of entire communities."
Point of View
The recent move to ban caste-based rallies raises pressing questions about representation and justice for marginalized communities. While the intent to foster social harmony is commendable, we must ensure that the voices of those historically disenfranchised are not stifled. The ongoing dialogue surrounding caste and identity is crucial for a fair society.
NationPress
24/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the reason behind the ban on caste-based rallies?
The ban was implemented in response to a ruling by the Allahabad High Court aimed at promoting social harmony and reducing communal tensions.
What are the implications of this ban on marginalized communities?
The ban may hinder the ability of marginalized groups to organize and advocate for their rights, potentially silencing their voices in a democratic society.
How does this decision affect the caste census?
The ongoing caste census may face challenges in accurately documenting caste identities if references are removed from public records.
What is Sanjay Nishad's stance on the government's decision?
Sanjay Nishad opposes the ban, stating it is not right and plans to urge the government to review the decision to protect the rights of marginalized communities.
What does the Constitution say about caste certification?
The Constitution allows for caste certification, emphasizing its importance for justice and equitable access to resources for various communities.
