Why Was Former Jharkhand Minister and Ex-MLA Detained at NTPC Mine Protest Site in Hazaribagh?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Ranchi, Feb 19 (NationPress) On Thursday, former state minister and prominent Congress figure Yogendra Sao, along with his wife, former MLA Nirmala Devi, was taken into custody by the Jharkhand Police during a protest against the NTPC's Chatti Bariatu coal mining project located in Hazaribagh district.
They were apprehended at the project site within the Keredari police station jurisdiction, where the couple had been actively leading a demonstration alongside local residents regarding issues pertaining to land acquisition and compensation.
As per police reports, multiple cases have been filed against both Yogendra Sao and Nirmala Devi across various police stations, including Barkagaon, Keredari, and Pagaar OP, related to protests and alleged disruptions.
The couple has been at the forefront of protests in the Chatti Bariatu mining region for several months, advocating for improved compensation for the land acquired for the project and proper rehabilitation for affected families.
On December 31, 2025, they initiated an indefinite sit-in at the project site with their supporters, a move that has significantly hindered mining and coal transportation activities.
A police team arrived at the protest location on Thursday and proceeded to detain both leaders before commencing legal actions.
Recently, Yogendra Sao traveled to Delhi with his daughter and former Barkagaon MLA Amba Prasad, where he conferred with senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. Upon returning from Delhi, he headed straight to the protest site.
The Chatti Bariatu coal mine, managed by NTPC Mining Limited, has been operational since April 2022 and was deemed commercially active in April 2024. This project boasts an annual production capacity of seven million tonnes.
Official data indicates that repeated disruptions over the last two years have resulted in financial losses exceeding Rs 224 crore. Company representatives assert that blockades, obstruction of coal transport routes, and limits on heavy machinery entry have negatively impacted operations.
They also reported that during a protest in January, truck drivers transporting coal faced assaults, resulting in injuries.
Conversely, Yogendra Sao argues that the company has not provided sufficient compensation for the land taken in the mining area. He claims that despite ongoing protests, neither the administration nor the company has engaged in meaningful discussions to address the concerns of the affected villagers.
Nevertheless, the company contends that it has offered compensation and rehabilitation packages that surpass the requirements outlined in the Land Acquisition Act.
Furthermore, it has highlighted that ongoing disruptions have led to considerable revenue losses for the state government and negatively impacted job opportunities for workers connected to the project.