Maharashtra FDA cancels Cipla warehouse licence in Pune over packaging, storage lapses

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Maharashtra FDA cancels Cipla warehouse licence in Pune over packaging, storage lapses

Synopsis

Maharashtra's drug regulator has cancelled Cipla's Pune warehouse licence, citing misbranding of a Schedule H drug, medicines stored on the floor, and missing disposal records — the outcome of a Bombay High Court-directed review that reopened proceedings the FDA had originally withdrawn in August.

Key Takeaways

The Maharashtra FDA cancelled drug sale and distribution licences of Cipla Pharma & Life Sciences Ltd 's C&F warehouse in Wadki, Pune , on 1 October 2026 .
The cancellation followed a Bombay High Court -directed review after earlier proceedings initiated on 27 August were withdrawn and reconsidered.
Reactin Plus Tablets , a Schedule H prescription medicine, was at the centre of the packaging-related allegations, with the FDA citing violations of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 .
Warehouse deficiencies allegedly included medicines stored on the floor, dust accumulation, absence of the mandatory Form 35 inspection book and improper handling of expired stock.
The FDA stated the fresh order was an independent regulatory determination and not a reiteration of the earlier withdrawn action.

The Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cancelled the drug sale and distribution licences of Cipla Pharma & Life Sciences Ltd's carrying and forwarding (C&F) warehouse in Wadki, Pune, citing alleged regulatory violations involving drug packaging, storage conditions, inventory management and documentation. The cancellation order was issued on 1 October 2026 by the Assistant Commissioner (Drugs), Division 3, Pune, following a court-directed review.

Background and Court Direction

The current proceedings stem from an earlier action initiated against the facility on 27 August, which was subsequently withdrawn and reconsidered under a revised regulatory process following directions from the Bombay High Court. Acting on the court's directives, the FDA issued a revised show-cause notice to Cipla on 4 September. The company filed its written response on 11 September and appeared for a personal hearing on 21 September. After examining Cipla's submissions, inspection reports, records and applicable legal provisions, the licensing authority issued the fresh revocation order.

Packaging Violations: Reactin Plus Under Scrutiny

A central concern in the FDA's review was the packaging of Reactin Plus Tablets, a Schedule H prescription medicine marketed by Cipla. According to the regulator, the product's packaging described it as an analgesic and listed multiple uses — including relief from headache, muscular pain, backache, joint pain, sprain, body ache and toothache — and featured a human figure alongside visual depictions suggesting pain relief.

The FDA alleged that these claims, descriptions and illustrations did not comply with statutory requirements and amounted to misbranding under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Notably, the regulator stated that Cipla's responsibility as the product's marketer could not be avoided merely because the medicine was manufactured by a separate entity.

Warehouse Management Deficiencies

Beyond packaging concerns, the FDA inspection reportedly uncovered multiple deficiencies in the Wadki warehouse's operations. These included the absence of the mandatory Form 35 inspection book, inadequate storage infrastructure that resulted in medicines being stored directly on the floor, dust accumulation on drug stocks and overall cleanliness shortcomings.

The regulator also alleged that expired medicines were not stored in a separately designated area clearly marked as 'Expiry-Not for Sale', as required under applicable norms. Additionally, the FDA cited the absence of prescribed standard operating procedures and disposal records for expired drugs.

FDA's Position on the Fresh Order

The Maharashtra FDA clarified that the latest licence revocation represented an independent regulatory determination based on the findings of the renewed proceedings, and was not a simple repetition of the earlier withdrawn action. The regulator's position underscores the seriousness with which it views the cumulative lapses identified at the facility.

This case highlights the growing regulatory scrutiny on pharmaceutical warehousing and labelling practices across Maharashtra, where the FDA has stepped up inspections of C&F operations in recent months. For Cipla — one of India's largest drug manufacturers — the development adds a compliance overhang on its domestic distribution network as the company navigates ongoing audits.

Point of View

And equally litigated. The Bombay High Court's intervention to reset the proceedings signals judicial discomfort with the procedural rigour of the original action, which could itself become a template for industry challenges to FDA show-cause notices. What's telling is the FDA's insistence that Cipla, as marketer, owns the packaging liability regardless of who manufactures the drug — a principle that has significant implications for the common industry practice of outsourced contract manufacturing. If upheld, similar logic could expose dozens of pharma marketers to fresh scrutiny over their C&F operations statewide.
NationPress
2 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Maharashtra FDA cancel Cipla's Pune warehouse licence?
The Maharashtra FDA cancelled the drug sale and distribution licences of Cipla's C&F warehouse in Wadki, Pune, on 1 October 2026, citing alleged violations including misbranding of Reactin Plus Tablets, improper storage of medicines and expired drugs, missing inspection records and the absence of standard operating procedures. The order followed a fresh review conducted under directions from the Bombay High Court.
What is Reactin Plus and why was it flagged?
Reactin Plus Tablets is a Schedule H prescription analgesic marketed by Cipla. The FDA alleged its packaging carried unauthorised claims listing multiple uses — including relief from headache, backache and joint pain — and featured visual depictions that did not comply with statutory requirements, amounting to misbranding under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.
What role did the Bombay High Court play in this case?
The Bombay High Court directed the FDA to reconsider its earlier action, which had been initiated on 27 August and was subsequently withdrawn. Acting on the court's directions, the FDA issued a revised show-cause notice to Cipla on 4 September, held a personal hearing on 21 September and issued the fresh licence cancellation order on 1 October 2026.
What warehouse deficiencies were identified at the Cipla facility?
The FDA inspection reportedly found medicines stored directly on the floor, dust accumulation on drug stocks, poor cleanliness, absence of the mandatory Form 35 inspection book, failure to store expired medicines in a designated 'Expiry-Not for Sale' area and missing records for the disposal of expired drugs.
Can Cipla challenge the licence cancellation?
The order does not preclude a legal challenge, and Cipla has the option to approach the Bombay High Court or relevant appellate authority. Given that the court had already intervened once in this matter, any fresh challenge would likely be closely scrutinised for procedural compliance on both sides.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 9 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google