Sugar price rise driven by market sentiment, not ethanol diversion: GEMA
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The recent surge in sugar prices is being fuelled by market sentiment and forward-looking expectations around the upcoming sugarcane crop — not by the diversion of sugarcane for ethanol production, the Grain Ethanol Manufacturers Association (GEMA) said on Monday, 24 August. The industry body's position directly aligns with the government's own assessment on the matter.
GEMA's Core Argument
Dr C.K. Jain, President of GEMA, said ethanol diversion should not be held responsible for the current price increase. He pointed to the ex-mill price and the markup over it as the key indicator, arguing that a high market markup signals that sentiment — not supply constraints — is the primary driver.
'Ethanol production is no factor in the rise in sugar prices. The sugar price in the market is totally sentimental,' Jain said.
Jain added that GEMA agrees '100 per cent' with the government's position that ethanol production should not bear the blame for higher sugar prices.
Background: The Ethanol Diversion Decision
The decision on diversion of sugarcane for ethanol during the ethanol supply year 2025–26 was taken in September 2025, at a time when approximately 30 lakh tonnes of surplus sugar — which would otherwise have gone into storage — was earmarked for conversion into fuel. Jain noted that this decision was made in the context of expected surplus, not scarcity.
Subsequently, factors including excessive rainfall, red rot disease in sugarcane, and waterlogging did affect sugarcane and sugar output to some degree. However, according to Jain, the reduction has not been severe enough to cause an actual shortage in the market.
Stock Levels and Mill Operations
'Even today, there is enough stock in the sugar mills, enough stocks,' Jain said, indicating that current inventories remain adequate. Sugar mills are also expected to resume operations from 15 October, which should further ease any near-term supply concerns.
The Structural Anomaly: FRP vs MSP
Jain highlighted a deeper, systemic issue underpinning sugar price pressures. The government raises the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) paid to farmers for sugarcane every year, steadily increasing the raw material cost for mills. Yet the Minimum Selling Price (MSP) of sugar has not been revised in the last eight years.
'This is the anomaly in our system which needs to be rectified,' Jain said, stressing that a balance must be struck between the interests of farmers, sugar mills, and consumers. This structural mismatch, critics argue, creates a squeeze on mill margins and can feed into retail price volatility over time.
What to Watch
With mills set to restart in mid-October and the next sugarcane crop outcome still uncertain, sentiment-driven price movements could persist in the near term. The government's handling of the FRP-MSP gap will be closely watched by both the industry and consumer advocacy groups in the months ahead.