Gajendra Chauhan hits back at Naseeruddin Shah over SRFTI protest remarks

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Gajendra Chauhan hits back at Naseeruddin Shah over SRFTI protest remarks

Synopsis

Gajendra Chauhan — himself once at the centre of a landmark FTII student protest — has turned the tables, publicly rebuking Naseeruddin Shah for calling the BJP a 'bloody jhooti party' over the SRFTI unrest. The exchange puts two veteran actors on opposite sides of a deepening row over government influence in India's premier film institutes.

Key Takeaways

Gajendra Chauhan publicly rebuked Naseeruddin Shah on 24 October over the latter's criticism of the BJP regarding the SRFTI student protest.
Chauhan objected to Naseeruddin Shah's description of the BJP as a ‘bloody jhooti party,’ calling it shameful given the party's mandate from 140 crore Indians.
Naseeruddin Shah had alleged the BJP was taking ‘revenge’ on those who oppose its beliefs, with SRFTI students cited as the latest targets.
SRFTI students in Kolkata are on an indefinite sit-in demanding their Vice-Chancellor's resignation, following a clash with ABGP , an RSS-affiliated group.
Chauhan urged Naseeruddin Shah to advise students constructively rather than criticise the government, while affirming the institute's administration is capable of resolving the dispute.

Actor Gajendra Chauhan has publicly responded to veteran actor Naseeruddin Shah's criticism of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government over the ongoing student unrest at the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute (SRFTI), urging the senior actor to offer guidance to students rather than attack the ruling party. The remarks came on 24 October amid an indefinite sit-in protest at SRFTI by students demanding the resignation of their Vice-Chancellor.

Chauhan's Sharp Rebuke

Expressing clear disappointment, Gajendra Chauhan took strong exception to Naseeruddin Shah's characterisation of the BJP as a 'bloody jhooti party.' 'It is a very sad thing. A party that has been ruling the country for the last 12-13 years, you called it ‘bloody jhooti party’. You should be ashamed. 140 crore people of the country have made that party sit at the top, and you are abusing it,' Chauhan said.

He further accused the veteran actor of consistently presenting a one-sided view. 'You are a great artist. You are a good human being. But I have always seen that in your tweets, in your videos, you always talk one-sidedly. You never look at both sides of the coin,' Chauhan added.

On the SRFTI Situation

Chauhan maintained that the institute's administration is fully equipped to handle the ongoing dispute and stressed that dialogue, not protest alone, yields results. 'If there is a strike in SRFTI, the administration there will look into it. There are capable people sitting there. It is a student's right to protest, but there is no result to protest unless you sit together and talk,' he said.

He urged Naseeruddin Shah to channel his stature constructively. 'You should advise the students, instead of criticising the government there, which has worked so hard. Just be a little positive,' Chauhan said.

What Naseeruddin Shah Said

On the preceding Saturday, Naseeruddin Shah alleged that the BJP is taking 'revenge' on all those who do not subscribe to its beliefs and policies, and claimed that SRFTI students were the latest targets of such an approach. His remarks triggered a sharp reaction from within the film fraternity, with Chauhan being among the first to respond publicly.

Background: The SRFTI Protest

Students at the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute in Kolkata are currently staging an indefinite sit-in, demanding the resignation of their Vice-Chancellor. The protest escalated following a clash between students and members of the Akhil Bharatiya Grahak Panchayat (ABGP), a consumer awareness group affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). This comes amid a broader pattern of student unrest at Indian film and media institutes in recent years, most notably the prolonged agitation at the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) in Pune in 2015 — also triggered by a government appointment — in which Chauhan himself was a central figure as the then-newly appointed FTII chairperson.

Notably, Chauhan's own tenure at FTII was marked by sustained student protests, lending an ironic dimension to his present call for institutional trust and dialogue. How the SRFTI administration responds to student demands in the coming days will determine whether the standoff can be resolved without further escalation.

Point of View

Whose 2015 appointment as FTII chairperson sparked one of the most prolonged student protests in Indian film institute history, is now urging institutional trust and dialogue at SRFTI. His credibility as an arbiter of such disputes is, at minimum, contested. More broadly, the Chauhan-Naseeruddin exchange reflects a recurring fault line in Indian public life — where cultural figures are expected to either endorse or oppose government decisions, with little space for nuance. The SRFTI protest, rooted in a concrete demand for a Vice-Chancellor's resignation, risks being overshadowed by this celebrity sparring, which serves neither the students nor the institution.
NationPress
25 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Gajendra Chauhan say about Naseeruddin Shah's SRFTI remarks?
Gajendra Chauhan criticised Naseeruddin Shah for calling the BJP a 'bloody jhooti party' in the context of the SRFTI student protest, saying Shah should be ashamed of abusing a party chosen by 140 crore Indians. He urged the veteran actor to advise students constructively rather than attack the government.
What is the SRFTI student protest about?
Students at the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute in Kolkata are staging an indefinite sit-in demanding the resignation of their Vice-Chancellor. The protest was triggered by a clash between students and members of the Akhil Bharatiya Grahak Panchayat (ABGP), an RSS-affiliated consumer awareness group.
What did Naseeruddin Shah say about the BJP and SRFTI?
Naseeruddin Shah alleged that the BJP is taking 'revenge' on all those who do not subscribe to its beliefs and policies, and claimed SRFTI students were the latest targets. He made these remarks on the Saturday preceding Chauhan's response.
Why is Gajendra Chauhan's response considered significant?
Chauhan's response carries historical weight because he was himself at the centre of a major student protest at the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) in Pune in 2015, when his government-backed appointment as chairperson sparked a prolonged agitation. His current call for institutional trust is seen by critics as ironic given that background.
What is the Akhil Bharatiya Grahak Panchayat (ABGP) and its connection to the SRFTI row?
The Akhil Bharatiya Grahak Panchayat (ABGP) is a consumer awareness organisation affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). A clash between SRFTI students and ABGP members directly preceded the student sit-in and is cited as a key trigger for the current protest.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 7 hours ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google