CINTAA row: Varsha Usgaonkar alleges staff loyal to Poonam Dhillon, Padmini Kolhapure

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
CINTAA row: Varsha Usgaonkar alleges staff loyal to Poonam Dhillon, Padmini Kolhapure

Synopsis

CINTAA's governance crisis has taken a sharper turn: veteran actress Varsha Usgaonkar now alleges the association's own staff are colluding with Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure, while a court has issued a contempt notice and frozen the October 20 election results. With FD funds under scrutiny and the body split in two, India's leading film-TV artists' body faces a full-blown institutional breakdown.

Key Takeaways

Varsha Usgaonkar alleged on 29 October 2026 that CINTAA staff are colluding with Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure .
She claimed the association's accountant gave evasive answers when questioned about fixed deposits and funds.
The CINTAA dispute began when 11 of 21 Executive Committee members resigned, citing autocratic functioning.
A court has issued a show-cause notice for contempt to CINTAA and directed it not to act on the 20 October election results.
Upasna Singh had alleged that Dhillon and Kolhapure broke fixed deposits and transferred funds from a frozen account; Dhillon denied the charges.

Veteran actress Varsha Usgaonkar has alleged that staff members of the Cine & TV Artistes' Association (CINTAA) are operating in collusion with Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure, deepening the governance crisis gripping the organisation. Usgaonkar made the allegations during a visit to the CINTAA office in Mumbai on 29 October 2026, claiming staff repeatedly refused to give proper answers when asked about the association's funds.

What Usgaonkar Alleged

Speaking to reporters, Usgaonkar said the loyalty of any organisation's staff must lie with the institution, not with individual members of its executive committee. 'The loyalty of the staff members of any organization should be towards the organization and not towards any member of the executive committee because they are not their personal staff; they are the staff of the organization. It came to our attention that the loyalty of the staff towards the organization was very low, especially the accountant,' she said.

She further alleged that the association's accountant gave evasive responses — including 'I don't know' and 'I was on leave that day' — when questioned about fixed deposits and the flow of funds. 'The FD matter felt like a robbery to me. There is a trust. It is the money of the members. How can anybody touch it without their permission?' Usgaonkar said.

The Dispute at the Heart of the CINTAA Row

The current crisis traces back to several months ago when 11 of the 21 members of CINTAA's Executive Committee resigned, citing what they described as autocratic functioning. The resignations split the body into two factions: one aligned with Padmini Kolhapure and Poonam Dhillon, and the other with Upasna Singh and Sahila Chadha.

Singh's faction had accused Dhillon and Kolhapure of allegedly breaking the association's fixed deposits and transferring funds from a bank account that was supposed to remain frozen during the ongoing management dispute. Dhillon, however, has maintained that CINTAA's financial records are accessible to all executive committee members and denied any wrongdoing.

Court Steps In With Contempt Notice

The dispute has now reached the courts. In a significant legal development, a court has issued a show-cause notice for contempt of court to CINTAA. The court directed the association not to act upon or give effect to the 20 October election results, in which Kolhapure and Dhillon reportedly emerged victorious with the highest number of votes.

The court order effectively puts those election results in legal limbo, raising questions about the current governance structure of the association and who holds legitimate authority over its funds and decisions.

What This Means for CINTAA Members

At the centre of the dispute is the welfare fund and fixed deposits maintained by CINTAA — money that belongs to its broader membership of film and television artists. Critics argue that the opacity around these funds and the alleged staff partisanship undermines the trust that member artists place in the body. Notably, this is not the first time a film industry guild in India has faced internal governance breakdowns, but the involvement of a court contempt notice marks a sharp escalation.

With the contempt notice now in play and elections under judicial scrutiny, the next few weeks will be critical in determining whether CINTAA can restore institutional credibility — or whether the dispute deepens further into litigation.

Point of View

And that shift matters. A contempt notice effectively delegitimises the October 20 election results — meaning the faction that claims to have won a democratic mandate is now operating in legal grey territory. What is striking is that the dispute over staff loyalty and fund opacity is not unique to CINTAA; it echoes similar breakdowns in other film and sports bodies in India, where governance reforms have lagged organisational growth. The real casualty here is ordinary member-artists, whose welfare funds are caught in a factional crossfire while the courts and committees argue process. Until CINTAA adopts transparent financial reporting with independent oversight, no election result will settle this.
NationPress
29 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CINTAA row about?
The CINTAA row is an ongoing governance dispute within the Cine & TV Artistes' Association, triggered when 11 of its 21 Executive Committee members resigned citing autocratic functioning. The crisis has since expanded to include allegations of improper fund transfers, staff partisanship, and a court contempt notice over disputed election results.
What did Varsha Usgaonkar allege about CINTAA staff?
Varsha Usgaonkar alleged that CINTAA staff, particularly the accountant, have been acting in the interest of Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure rather than the organisation as a whole. She claimed the accountant gave evasive responses when questioned about the association's fixed deposits and funds.
What has the court ordered regarding CINTAA?
A court has issued a show-cause notice for contempt of court to CINTAA and directed it not to act upon or give effect to the October 20 election results, in which Padmini Kolhapure and Poonam Dhillon emerged victorious. The order effectively puts those results under judicial review.
What are the allegations about CINTAA's fixed deposits?
Upasna Singh alleged that Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure broke the association's fixed deposits and transferred funds from a bank account that was supposed to remain frozen during the management dispute. Dhillon has denied this, saying financial records are accessible to all executive committee members.
Who are the two factions in the CINTAA dispute?
One faction is aligned with Padmini Kolhapure and Poonam Dhillon, while the other is led by Upasna Singh and Sahila Chadha. The split emerged after 11 Executive Committee members resigned, citing concerns about the association's functioning.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 4 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google