Upasana Singh accuses Poonam Dhillon, Padmini Kolhapure of CINTAA misuse for self-publicity

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Upasana Singh accuses Poonam Dhillon, Padmini Kolhapure of CINTAA misuse for self-publicity

Synopsis

CINTAA's internal crisis has gone fully public — former General Secretary Upasana Singh is now alleging that the association's leadership used cropped photographs, exclusive press conferences, and CINTAA's own funds to spotlight only Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure, while elected EC members were reportedly locked out of events. With 11 resignations already in, the row signals a deeper governance breakdown inside one of Bollywood's oldest artiste bodies.

Key Takeaways

Upasana Singh , former General Secretary of CINTAA , has accused Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure of using the association's platforms for personal publicity.
Singh alleged that photographs from ministerial meetings were cropped to exclude other EC members and feature only Dhillon and Kolhapure.
She claims EC members were not invited to a press conference for the Raj Kapoor Night event and were given a delayed slot at a Hema Malini -related press conference.
11 Executive Committee members — including 8 elected members — resigned earlier in August citing unfair decision-making and misuse of positions.
At a press conference on 24 August , Dhillon and Kolhapure rejected all allegations, calling them 'baseless and false' and affirming responsible use of funds.

Former General Secretary of the Cine and TV Artistes Association (CINTAA), Upasana Singh, has levelled serious allegations against the organisation's current leadership, accusing Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure of allegedly using CINTAA's platforms, funds, and events for personal publicity. The accusations surfaced on 28 August amid a deepening internal crisis within the association, following the resignation of 11 Executive Committee members earlier this month.

Key Allegations by Upasana Singh

Singh alleged that photographs from ministerial meetings attended by multiple Executive Committee members were selectively cropped to feature only Dhillon and Kolhapure. 'We used to go only to meet the ministers. If you look at our phones, I can show you so many photographs of meeting the ministers, which we also used to go. But whose photographs were printed? Photographs were printed only of Poonam and Padmini,' she said.

She further alleged that if any other member's photograph was included, it was cropped out. 'This has happened with Dilbaghji as well. So, only her photographs will be printed. Then, CINTAA was used only for her publicity,' Singh claimed.

Press Conferences and Exclusion of EC Members

Singh alleged that CINTAA's funds were used to organise press conferences where Dhillon and Kolhapure were given disproportionate prominence. She specifically pointed to a press conference tied to the Raj Kapoor Night event, claiming that no other Executive Committee members were invited. 'In that, none of our EC members were invited. Only Poonam and Padmini were invited,' she said, adding that she only learnt of the event through media reports afterwards.

She also alleged that at a press conference connected to a show involving veteran actress Hema Malini, EC members were given a reporting time of 3.30 pm while the event had already commenced at 12.30 pm. 'When Deepak Parashar knocked when he reached the venue, nobody even opened the door,' Singh alleged.

The Resignation Crisis Inside CINTAA

The allegations come in the backdrop of a significant internal rupture. Eleven members of CINTAA's Executive Committee resigned earlier in August, of whom eight were elected membersHemant Pandey, Mukesh Rishi, Sahila Chadha, Hetal Parmar, Puneet Issar, Vindu Dara Singh, Vikas Verma, and Deepak Parashar. Their resignations were accompanied by allegations of unfair decision-making and misuse of positions within the organisation.

Leadership Rejects the Charges

At a CINTAA press conference held on 24 August, Dhillon and Kolhapure categorically rejected Singh's allegations. Poonam Dhillon described the accusations as 'baseless and false,' asserting that all funds raised by CINTAA were fully accounted for and that no money was used for personal gain. Padmini Kolhapure echoed this position, stating that funds were handled responsibly and directed towards their intended beneficiaries.

What Happens Next

With eight elected members having stepped down and counter-allegations flying publicly, CINTAA faces a credibility test over its internal governance. The dispute is likely to attract scrutiny from the broader film industry and possibly regulatory bodies overseeing registered artiste associations. How the organisation resolves this leadership conflict could set a precedent for accountability within Bollywood's trade bodies.

Point of View

It signals institutional dysfunction, not just personal friction. The allegation that CINTAA funds were used to stage press conferences from which fellow committee members were excluded — if substantiated — would raise serious questions about fiduciary responsibility. Bollywood's trade bodies have long operated with minimal external oversight; this row may be the moment that changes.
NationPress
28 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are Upasana Singh's allegations against CINTAA's leadership?
Upasana Singh, former General Secretary of CINTAA, has alleged that Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure used the association's funds and platforms for personal publicity, including cropping other EC members out of official photographs and excluding them from press conferences. She made these allegations in the context of the ongoing internal crisis following 11 EC resignations.
Why did CINTAA Executive Committee members resign?
Eleven members of CINTAA's Executive Committee resigned earlier in August 2025, with eight being elected members including Hemant Pandey, Mukesh Rishi, Puneet Issar, and Vindu Dara Singh. Their resignations were accompanied by allegations of unfair decision-making and misuse of positions by the current leadership.
How have Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure responded to the allegations?
At a CINTAA press conference on 24 August, both Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure rejected the allegations as baseless and false. Dhillon stated that all funds raised were fully accounted for, while Kolhapure maintained that resources were handled responsibly and directed to their intended beneficiaries.
What specific incidents has Upasana Singh cited as evidence?
Singh cited three specific incidents: photographs from ministerial meetings being cropped to feature only Dhillon and Kolhapure; EC members being excluded from a press conference for the Raj Kapoor Night event; and EC members being given a 3.30 pm slot for a Hema Malini-related press conference that had already started at 12.30 pm.
What is CINTAA and why does this dispute matter?
CINTAA, the Cine and TV Artistes Association, is one of India's oldest and most prominent bodies representing film and television performers. The current dispute matters because it involves allegations of financial misuse and exclusion of elected members, raising broader questions about governance and accountability within Bollywood's institutional structures.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 days ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 8 months ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google