Why is the Kerala HC continuing the investigation into the death of Suraj Lama?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kochi, Feb 11 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court on Wednesday declined to dismiss the habeas corpus petition related to the mysterious disappearance and subsequent death of Suraj Lama, an Indian national who was deported from Kuwait.
A division bench comprising Justice Devan Ramachandran and Justice M.B. Snehalatha instructed the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to persist with their inquiry.
The court emphasized that the complete timeline of events, from Lama’s entry into India to the discovery of his remains, must be thoroughly investigated and accurately recorded.
After being deported from Kuwait, he was sent to Kochi under official directives.
The judges acknowledged that he seemed vulnerable and might have had cognitive or other impairments. Nevertheless, he was permitted to pass through immigration and airport protocols without any assistance.
Following a report of his disappearance, law enforcement placed him into protective custody and admitted him to Kalamassery Medical College Hospital.
He was later released after doctors reportedly found no significant health issues.
Shortly after, a body was discovered in Kalamassery.
A forensic analysis confirmed the remains belonged to Lama.
The Government Pleader informed the court that an interim post-mortem report dated December 1, 2025, indicated that the cause of death could not be established due to advanced decomposition.
The court noted that the case remains “wide open” as the cause of death is yet to be determined.
It asserted that the petition cannot be dismissed solely because the body has been identified.
The bench ordered the investigating officer to present the missing case file and the post-mortem report.
It also instructed the SIT, led by the City Police Commissioner or a similarly ranked officer, to continue the investigation.
The judges acknowledged allegations of negligence at several stages, including immigration clearance, police handling, and medical care.
It also recorded the petitioner’s assertion that the possibility of murder cannot be dismissed.
“We are not probing a murder. We are looking into the sequence leading up to the body’s discovery,” the court clarified.
The matter is set for a hearing in three weeks.