New Delhi, Jan 9 (NationPress) – The Supreme Court, while continuing its hearing in the suo motu case regarding the management of stray dogs in public areas, clearly stated that allegations of harassment, assault, or the use of derogatory language against women feeding dogs are considered criminal offenses. These matters must be addressed under penal law and not dealt with in individual cases before the apex court.

A bench consisting of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and N.V. Anjaria was listening to submissions from animal rights advocates, NGOs, and groups representing victims.

During the session, senior advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani, representing an animal rights activist, claimed that women feeding dogs nationwide face harassment, assaults, and public humiliation from so-called “anti-feeder vigilantes.” In numerous instances, police have allegedly failed to register FIRs despite receiving complaints.

Pavani highlighted cases where women were reportedly beaten, molested, and defamed, citing instances in some housing societies in Haryana where bouncers were reportedly hired to target dog feeders.

She argued that the inaction of authorities represents a passive endorsement of such actions.

In response, the Justice Vikram Nath-led bench recommended that affected individuals should approach local police, magistrates, or jurisdictional High Courts. However, it made it clear that the Supreme Court cannot adjudicate individual criminal complaints.

“If someone is harassing women, it is a crime under the Penal Code. Get FIRs registered. Procedures are available,” the apex court stated, emphasizing that the issue is fundamentally one of law and order.

Regarding allegations of derogatory and abusive comments directed at women dog feeders on social media and other platforms, the bench remarked that such remarks do not enjoy protection under free speech if they violate a woman’s dignity, reiterating that legal recourse is available under existing laws.

The Supreme Court clarified that its proceedings are focused solely on stray dog management and public safety, and do not encompass unrelated matters such as dog breeding or the importation of foreign breeds.

Moreover, the top court denied a request to view videos purportedly showing cruelty to dogs, noting that the internet is replete with footage of both animal abuse and dog attacks on children and the elderly. It stated that the hearing should not devolve into a contest of such visuals. The proceedings will resume on January 13 (Tuesday).