Will South Korean Judges Revisit Controversial Ruling in Lee's Election Law Case?

Click to start listening
Will South Korean Judges Revisit Controversial Ruling in Lee's Election Law Case?

Synopsis

In a gripping development, South Korean judges are set to reconvene to deliberate on the Supreme Court's controversial ruling affecting President Lee Jae-myung's electoral campaign. This decision could have significant implications for judicial independence and public trust. Stay tuned as we explore the unfolding legal drama.

Key Takeaways

  • Judges to reconvene on June 30 to discuss the Supreme Court ruling.
  • Concerns over judicial independence and public trust are at the forefront.
  • Lee's retrial has been postponed due to constitutional protections.
  • A guilty verdict could impact Lee's presidential candidacy.
  • The council comprises 126 judges from various court levels.

Seoul, June 9 (NationPress) Judges from various regions of South Korea will gather once more this month to address the contentious Supreme Court ruling regarding President Lee Jae-myung's alleged breach of election laws, a decision made during his campaign, as reported on Monday. The National Council of Judges has announced that the second extraordinary session will occur via video conference at 10 a.m. on June 30, following a prior meeting that concluded without an official declaration.

This upcoming session will be conducted entirely online, unlike the previous gathering, which allowed both in-person and virtual attendance. Participants are anticipated to revisit the seven agenda items from the last meeting, along with any new issues that may arise.

During the meeting on May 26, the council considered the possibility of issuing a public statement expressing concerns about judicial independence and the public's confidence in the judiciary after the Supreme Court's ruling in Lee's situation. However, members opted to postpone making any statements, fearing that it could potentially influence the presidential election set for June 3, according to Yonhap news agency.

The dispute originates from the Supreme Court's unusually rapid decision last month to reverse a lower court's acquittal of Lee and return the case to the Seoul High Court for retrial. Lee faced accusations of making false statements during the 2021 presidential campaign.

The Supreme Court identified mistakes in the lower court's acquittal, but Lee's Democratic Party condemned the ruling as an act of election interference, as a guilty verdict could prevent him from participating in the race.

The council consists of 126 judges' delegates from all court levels, and a majority presence is necessary to convene a meeting. Agenda items are sanctioned with the approval of the majority in attendance.

Earlier today, the Seoul High Court once again delayed President Lee's retrial concerning election law violations, stating that the initial hearing scheduled for June 18 has been postponed to an unspecified future date in accordance with Article 84 of the Constitution, which protects a sitting President from criminal prosecution except in cases of insurrection or treason.

Lee was elected President on June 3 after former President Yoon Suk Yeol was ousted due to a failed imposition of martial law in December.

Previously, the Seoul High Court postponed the first hearing from May 15, citing the need to ensure a 'fair electioneering opportunity' for the then-presidential candidate Lee.

Point of View

It is essential to recognize the delicate balance between judicial integrity and political influence. With the upcoming presidential election, the implications of judicial decisions on public perception cannot be understated. This situation calls for a transparent approach to uphold the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
NationPress
09/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling in Lee's case?
The ruling has raised concerns about judicial independence and its potential impact on the upcoming presidential election.
When will the judges reconvene to discuss the ruling?
The judges are set to reconvene via video conference on June 30 at 10 a.m.
Why was the retrial of President Lee postponed?
The retrial was postponed due to Article 84 of the Constitution, which protects a sitting President from criminal prosecution in most cases.
What accusations does President Lee face?
President Lee is accused of making false statements during the 2021 presidential campaign.
What are the implications of a guilty verdict for President Lee?
A guilty verdict could prevent him from participating in the electoral race.