Syria-Jordan joint security committee formed after deadly airstrikes on Daraa
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Syria and Jordan agreed on Wednesday, 28 October 2026 to establish a joint security committee to investigate recent Jordanian airstrikes on southern Syria, even as the Nasib border crossing between the two countries reopened after a brief closure. The agreement signals an effort by Damascus and Amman to manage a sharp diplomatic rupture without allowing it to escalate into a broader bilateral crisis.
How the Agreement Was Reached
The deal was formalised during a telephone call between Syrian Foreign Affairs Chief Asaad al-Shaibani and Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi, according to a joint statement carried by Syrian state news agency SANA early Wednesday. Both officials underscored the need for direct security coordination to combat terrorism and cross-border trafficking of drugs and arms, and reaffirmed their commitment to maintaining close bilateral ties.
During the conversation, Safadi expressed deep regret over the civilian casualties caused by the airstrikes and extended condolences to the families of the victims.
The Airstrikes and Their Toll
The Jordanian Air Force struck several locations in Syria's Daraa province on Monday evening, killing seven civilians — including three children — and injuring three others, according to Syrian accounts. The strikes triggered the temporary shutdown of the Nasib crossing on Tuesday, disrupting both passenger and commercial traffic. Normal operations at the crossing resumed on Wednesday morning, Syrian authorities confirmed.
Jordan's Justification and Syria's Objection
The Jordanian Armed Forces stated that the operation targeted Islamic State militants and was conducted in retaliation for a deadly attack during a church funeral in Karak governorate the previous Friday, alleging that those responsible were linked to militant organisations operating in southern Syria. Amman further claimed the strikes were carried out in coordination with Damascus.
The Syrian government, however, denied that any prior coordination had taken place and formally objected to military operations on Syrian territory without advance consultation. The contradictory accounts underscore the fragile trust between the two neighbours and explain the urgency behind the joint committee mechanism.
Broader Significance for Border Security
The Daraa province has long been a flashpoint for cross-border smuggling networks — particularly the so-called 'captagon corridor' — and sporadic militant activity, making it a persistent source of friction between Syria and Jordan. This is not the first time Amman has conducted strikes inside Syrian territory; previous operations targeted drug smugglers near the border. However, the killing of civilians in this round significantly raised the diplomatic stakes.
The formation of a joint security committee, if operationalised, could provide a structured channel to prevent unilateral military action from triggering a wider rift. Analysts note that both Damascus and Amman have strong economic incentives — including trade through the Nasib crossing — to keep the bilateral relationship functional despite deep political differences.
What Comes Next
The joint committee's terms of reference, composition, and timeline have not yet been publicly detailed. Its effectiveness will depend on whether Damascus and Amman can agree on a shared account of Monday's strikes and on protocols governing future counter-terrorism operations near the shared border. Regional observers will be watching closely to see whether the committee translates into meaningful operational coordination or remains a diplomatic gesture.