Are There Really 333 Gram Nyayalayas Functioning in 11 States?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- 333 Gram Nyayalayas are operational in 11 States.
- Uttar Pradesh leads with 109 Gram Nyayalayas.
- Funding includes Rs 18 lakh for setup and Rs 3.20 lakh for annual operations for three years.
- Some states have not operationalized due to various challenges.
- Community awareness is crucial for the success of these courts.
New Delhi, Dec 13 (NationPress) The Minister of State for Law and Justice, Arjun Ram Meghwal, announced that 333 Gram Nyayalayas are currently operational across 11 States, delivering justice directly to citizens' doorsteps as per the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008.
Meghwal identified Uttar Pradesh as the leading state with 109 active rural courts, followed by Madhya Pradesh with 89.
According to data from State Governments and High Courts, 15 States and UTs have notified a total of 488 Gram Nyayalayas, of which 333 are functioning as of October 31, 2025, Meghwal noted in response to a question in the Lok Sabha.
The Act allows for the creation of Gram Nyayalayas at the intermediate panchayat level, and State Governments are tasked with their establishment in consultation with their respective High Courts, as outlined in Section 3(1) of the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008.
Meghwal pointed out that states like Telangana, J&K, Ladakh, and Andhra Pradesh currently have no operational Gram Nyayalayas, despite collectively notifying 119 of these courts.
Regarding funding, Meghwal explained that the Central Government offers one-time assistance for non-recurring expenses, capped at Rs 18 lakh per Gram Nyayalaya post-operationalization. Additionally, support for recurring operational costs amounts to Rs 3.20 lakh per Gram Nyayalaya annually for the first three years.
He elaborated that the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008 does not require State Governments to establish these rural courts, stating, “The Act enables, but does not mandate, the establishment of Gram Nyayalayas.”
Furthermore, Meghwal discussed challenges faced by some states in operationalizing rural courts, which include issues like unfilled positions for Nyayadhikaris, lack of public prosecutors, and a shortage of first-class judicial magistrates. He also cited insufficient staffing, limited jurisdiction, inadequate financial support from states, reluctance from legal authorities, and a lack of community awareness as contributing factors.