42 former judges' open letter on INDIA Bloc protests backed by NDA leaders

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
42 former judges' open letter on INDIA Bloc protests backed by NDA leaders

Synopsis

Forty-two former Supreme Court and High Court judges — including three ex-Chief Justices — have broken their silence to challenge the INDIA Bloc's allegations of 'vote theft,' warning that branding constitutional bodies as 'compromised' risks destroying democratic trust. NDA leaders have seized on the letter as validation, calling the Opposition's campaign a push toward anarchy.

Key Takeaways

42 former judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts signed an open letter on 9 October 2026 expressing concern over Opposition attacks on constitutional institutions.
The letter questioned 'vote theft' allegations made without evidence and defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
Signatories include three former High Court Chief Justices: B.C.
Patel , Subhro Kamal Mukherjee , and Permod Kohli .
NDA leaders including Ram Kripal Yadav , Guru Prakash , Rajiv Ranjan , and Mrityunjay Tiwari welcomed the letter and called on the Opposition to introspect.
The INDIA Bloc has not yet formally responded to the retired judges' open letter.

Several NDA leaders on 9 October 2026 welcomed an open letter signed by 42 former judges of the Supreme Court and various High Courts, expressing concern over what the signatories described as a campaign to undermine the Election Commission, the judiciary, and other constitutional institutions. The leaders said the retired judges had articulated the 'right sentiment' and called on the Opposition to introspect.

What the Open Letter Said

In a strongly worded letter, the 42 former judges — including three former High Court Chief Justices — questioned allegations of 'vote theft' made without supporting evidence. They warned that repeatedly branding constitutional authorities as 'thieves' and 'compromised' risked eroding public trust in Indian democracy. The signatories also defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, describing it as a legally established exercise aimed at ensuring clean and accurate voter lists.

Among the prominent signatories are former Chief Justice of the Jammu & Kashmir and Delhi High Court, B.C. Patel; former Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, Subhro Kamal Mukherjee; and former Chief Justice of the Sikkim High Court, Permod Kohli.

NDA Leaders Respond

Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav said, 'The respected former judges have expressed a good sentiment in their letter.' He alleged that questions raised against the Election Commission were 'part of a conspiracy to weaken the constitutional system,' adding that 'the Opposition wants to create a situation of anarchy.'

BJP National Spokesperson Guru Prakash said the Opposition's claims were 'without evidence, without a cause, without basis.' He noted that the Supreme Court had 'repeatedly given its stance on SIR and its constitutional credibility' as well as on Form 6, and urged the Opposition to 'reflect, think and introspect.'

Janata Dal (United) National Spokesperson Rajiv Ranjan said the letter demonstrated that 'the public and the country's intellectuals are watching' Opposition attempts to 'weaken Indian democracy by targeting constitutional institutions.'

BJP leader Mrityunjay Tiwari said, 'The 150 crore people of the country are also concerned about why the INDIA Bloc leaders are raising questions about constitutional institutions and weakening democracy and the Constitution.'

Context and Background

The open letter emerges against the backdrop of sustained Opposition criticism of the Election Commission's voter roll revision process. The INDIA Bloc — a coalition of opposition parties — has repeatedly alleged irregularities in the SIR exercise, raising questions about the integrity of electoral rolls in several states. Critics within the Opposition argue that the SIR process disproportionately deletes the names of marginalised voters.

This comes amid a broader pattern of institutional contestation in Indian politics, where both the ruling coalition and the Opposition have invoked constitutional authorities to buttress their respective positions. Notably, the Supreme Court has previously weighed in on Form 6 provisions and the SIR framework, lending the NDA's argument some judicial grounding, though the Opposition contests that interpretation.

What Happens Next

The open letter is likely to intensify political debate ahead of upcoming state assembly elections. Constitutional and legal experts are expected to weigh in on whether the SIR exercise complies with established electoral law, and Opposition parties have not yet formally responded to the retired judges' letter. All eyes will be on whether the INDIA Bloc issues a counter-statement or escalates its campaign through legal channels.

Point of View

But its framing deserves scrutiny. Retired judges voicing concern about institutional credibility carry genuine weight — yet the letter's timing and the chorus of NDA endorsement risk its perception as partisan rather than purely constitutional. The core question the letter raises — whether evidence-free allegations of 'vote theft' damage democratic norms — is legitimate and important. But that question sits alongside an equally important one: whether the SIR process itself meets the transparency standards that would make such allegations harder to sustain. A genuine defence of institutions requires rigour on both sides of that ledger.
NationPress
9 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the 42 former judges say in their open letter?
The 42 former judges questioned allegations of 'vote theft' made without supporting evidence, warning that branding constitutional bodies such as the Election Commission as 'compromised' risks eroding public trust in Indian democracy. They also defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls as a legally established exercise.
Who are the prominent signatories of the open letter?
The letter was signed by 42 former Supreme Court and High Court judges, including three former High Court Chief Justices: B.C. Patel (J&K and Delhi High Court), Subhro Kamal Mukherjee (Karnataka High Court), and Permod Kohli (Sikkim High Court).
Why have NDA leaders welcomed the open letter?
NDA leaders said the letter validated their position that the Opposition's campaign against the Election Commission and other constitutional institutions is without evidence and amounts to an attempt to create 'anarchy.' They used the letter to call on the INDIA Bloc to reflect and introspect.
What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a periodic exercise conducted by the Election Commission to update and clean voter rolls, removing ineligible entries and adding new eligible voters. The Supreme Court has previously upheld its constitutional credibility, though Opposition parties allege the process disproportionately deletes names of marginalised voters.
Has the INDIA Bloc responded to the open letter?
As of 9 October 2026, the INDIA Bloc had not formally responded to the retired judges' open letter. The Opposition is expected to either issue a counter-statement or pursue the matter through legal channels in the days ahead.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. Yesterday
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google