BJP hails SC ruling on SIR electoral rolls, tells Opposition to stop blaming ECI

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BJP hails SC ruling on SIR electoral rolls, tells Opposition to stop blaming ECI

Synopsis

The Supreme Court's endorsement of the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision exercise handed the BJP a ready political weapon on Wednesday — and the party used it immediately. Multiple BJP leaders, from Bihar to Telangana, framed the ruling as proof that Opposition resistance to SIR was never about democratic integrity but about preserving inaccurate voter rolls that allegedly benefited them.

Key Takeaways

The Supreme Court on 27 May 2025 upheld the Election Commission of India's authority to conduct the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
BJP leader Rohan Gupta called the verdict a 'slap' for those who politicised the SIR process, linking it to Rahul Gandhi's earlier remarks on voter list errors in Karnataka .
BJP Bihar President Sanjay Saraogi said the exercise was necessary to remove entries for deceased persons, duplicate registrations, and ineligible voters.
BJP Telangana President N.
Ramchander Rao declared the INDIA bloc's campaign against SIR 'shattered' by the Supreme Court judgment.
The verdict is expected to shape political discourse around voter list integrity ahead of upcoming state elections.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Wednesday, 27 May welcomed the Supreme Court verdict upholding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, asserting that Opposition parties must stop citing the exercise as an excuse for their successive electoral losses. The apex court ruled that the revision of voter lists falls squarely within the constitutional and statutory authority of the Election Commission of India (ECI) and is aimed at protecting the integrity of the electoral process.

BJP's Immediate Reaction

BJP leader Rohan Gupta described the judgment as a 'clear-cut' ruling in favour of the SIR process and said it exposed those who had attempted to politicise the issue. 'I believe this is a slap for those who were doing politics over the issue of SIR. This is the same SIR process that Rahul Gandhi referred to during a press conference in Bengaluru, where he spoke about alleged errors in the voter list in Karnataka. When SIR was introduced to correct those issues, it was opposed as well,' Gupta said.

He further argued that Opposition parties had repeatedly failed to secure public support and were now attempting to blame the electoral process for their defeats. 'Bihar and Bengal rejected them, and now, the Supreme Court has also made the decision. Now, they should stop this protest. Now they cannot use the SIR process as an excuse for their electoral defeat,' he added.

Bihar BJP Leaders Back the Verdict

BJP Bihar President Sanjay Saraogi said the ruling was expected, given that the Election Commission has full authority to conduct such an exercise to rectify discrepancies in voter lists. 'The voter list, which contains the names of deceased individuals, names at two places, permanently shifted individuals, or Rohingya/Bangladeshis, needs to be rectified, and the Election Commission has the right to do so,' Saraogi said. He alleged that the Opposition had attempted to create confusion before elections to mislead the public and preserve inaccurate voter entries.

Bihar Minister Shrawon Kumar also welcomed the verdict, accusing Opposition parties of spreading misinformation among voters and making 'baseless allegations' against the Election Commission.

UP Ministers Cite Transparency and Constitutional Strength

Uttar Pradesh Minister Danish Azad Ansari said the SIR process would strengthen democratic institutions by ensuring transparency and fairness. 'If elections are conducted with transparency and in a fair manner, the beauty of our Constitution will certainly become even stronger,' he said, adding that the Opposition had tried to spread confusion over the issue for political gains.

Uttar Pradesh Minister Om Prakash Rajbhar said the Supreme Court's approval reinforced the independence and authority of the Election Commission. 'The Election Commission is independent, and the Supreme Court has also put its seal of approval on it,' he said, alleging that the Opposition had historically benefited from inaccurate voter rolls.

Telangana BJP Declares Opposition Campaign 'Shattered'

BJP Telangana President N. Ramchander Rao said the campaign mounted by Opposition parties, including the INDIA bloc, against the SIR process had 'now been shattered.' 'The Supreme Court's judgment clearly says that there is no suspicious thing in the SIR process,' Rao said. He added that the Opposition's campaign was aimed at providing a convenient explanation for electoral losses rather than serving voters' interests.

The ruling is likely to intensify the political debate around voter list integrity ahead of upcoming state elections, with the BJP framing the verdict as a broader vindication of the ECI's independence.

Point of View

Coordinated response — spanning Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Telangana — suggests the party sees the verdict as an electoral asset, not merely a constitutional clarification. What is missing from the BJP's celebratory framing is any engagement with the Opposition's core concern: that SIR, however legally valid, could result in legitimate voters being dropped if the process is implemented hastily or without adequate safeguards. The real test of the ECI's credibility will be in the execution — whether the revision adds accuracy without disenfranchising genuine voters, particularly in states heading to polls soon.
NationPress
12 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a process conducted by the Election Commission of India to update and clean up voter lists by removing entries for deceased persons, duplicate registrations, and ineligible individuals. The Supreme Court on 27 May 2025 upheld the ECI's authority to conduct this exercise, ruling it falls within its constitutional and statutory mandate.
What did the Supreme Court rule on the SIR process?
The Supreme Court upheld the Election Commission of India's decision to conduct the SIR exercise, ruling that revision of electoral rolls is within the ECI's constitutional and statutory authority and is aimed at protecting the integrity of the electoral process. The ruling came on 27 May 2025.
Why did the Opposition oppose the SIR process?
Opposition parties, including the INDIA bloc, had raised concerns about the SIR exercise, alleging it could lead to legitimate voters being removed from electoral rolls. The BJP, however, characterised this opposition as an attempt to preserve inaccurate voter entries and deflect from electoral losses.
How did BJP leaders react to the Supreme Court verdict on SIR?
Multiple BJP leaders welcomed the verdict. BJP leader Rohan Gupta called it a 'clear-cut' ruling, BJP Bihar President Sanjay Saraogi said it was an expected outcome, and BJP Telangana President N. Ramchander Rao declared the Opposition's campaign against SIR 'shattered.' All urged the Opposition to stop using the process as an excuse for electoral defeats.
Which states are at the centre of the SIR controversy?
Bihar and West Bengal were specifically cited by BJP leaders as states where the Opposition had lost elections and subsequently blamed the electoral process. Karnataka was also referenced, with BJP's Rohan Gupta noting that Rahul Gandhi had himself flagged voter list errors there — the same issue SIR was designed to address.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 7 months ago
  4. 7 months ago
  5. 10 months ago
  6. 11 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google