Did the Gujarat court issue notices to Abhisar Sharma and Raju Parulekar over Adani Group’s defamation claims?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal move, the Adani Group has filed criminal defamation complaints against YouTuber Abhisar Sharma and blogger Raju Parulekar, alleging they spread false information. This case could have serious consequences, including imprisonment. Stay tuned to understand the implications of this unfolding story.
Key Takeaways
- The Adani Group has filed defamation complaints against YouTuber Abhisar Sharma and blogger Raju Parulekar.
- The case revolves around allegations of false information meant to tarnish Adani's reputation.
- Both accused face potential imprisonment and fines if found guilty.
- The complaints cite specific legal provisions from the BNS, 2023.
- Evidence includes video content and social media posts linked to the allegations.
Ahmedabad, Sep 16 (NationPress) The Adani Group has initiated criminal defamation proceedings against YouTuber Abhisar Sharma and blogger Raju Parulekar, claiming that they have intentionally disseminated false and defamatory information to damage its reputation.
A court in Gujarat has issued summons to both individuals, instructing them to appear on September 20. Should they admit to the charges, the cases may advance to trial, where they could face penalties of up to two years in prison, fines, or both.
The complaints were filed with the Judicial Magistrate First Class in Gandhinagar (PS Adalaj) and invoke Sections 356(1), 356(2), and 356(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, which correspond to IPC Sections 499, 500, and 501.
The allegations stem from a YouTube video posted by Sharma on August 18, 2025, in which he claims that vast amounts of land in Assam were allocated to Adani and links the company to a pattern of alleged political favoritism, along with a series of tweets and retweets by Parulekar since January 2025, making similar assertions regarding land seizures, scams, and undue advantages.
Adani contends that these claims are unfounded and deceptive, highlighting that the Gauhati High Court ruling from August 12, 2025, which they referenced, does not mention the Adani Group.
Furthermore, the company clarified that Mahabal Cement Pvt Ltd, the entity at the heart of the High Court case, has no affiliation with Adani whatsoever.
The evidence submitted to the court comprises the video and transcript from Sharma, Parulekar's social media content, the Gauhati High Court order, and additional supporting documentation.
Point of View
The ongoing legal disputes highlight the balance between freedom of expression and the protection of corporate reputations. The case against Sharma and Parulekar raises important questions about accountability in media and the implications of defamation laws in a democratic society.
NationPress
20/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the charges against Abhisar Sharma and Raju Parulekar?
They are facing criminal defamation charges for allegedly spreading false information about the Adani Group.
What is the potential penalty for the accused?
If found guilty, they could face up to two years in prison, fines, or both.
What evidence is being presented in court?
The evidence includes a video by Sharma, social media posts by Parulekar, and a High Court order.
When are the accused required to appear in court?
They are directed to appear on September 20.
What is the relationship between Adani Group and Mahabal Cement?
Adani Group clarified that Mahabal Cement Pvt Ltd has no connection to them.
