Ahmedabad rape case: Security agency owner booked for expired licence, untrained guard
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Ahmedabad Police have registered a separate case against the owner of a private security agency following their investigation into the alleged rape of a 23-year-old woman at a residential complex in the Jodhpur village area of Ahmedabad on 8 August 2026. The probe revealed that the accused guard had been deployed just four days after joining the agency — without formal training, police verification, or a security identification card.
The Accused and the Alleged Assault
The accused guard, identified as Dharamsingh Rathod, was employed by A-One Security Agency and had been posted at the residential complex where the victim was staying. According to police, the sequence of events on the night of 8 August began when Rathod went to the terrace at around 9 pm. The woman arrived there at approximately 9:15 pm for a walk.
Police allege that Rathod approached her, demanded a physical relationship, and subsequently attacked her. He allegedly used a wire to strangle her and covered her mouth before sexually assaulting her. The accused reportedly left the terrace at around 10:25 pm after locking the door. The woman later raised an alarm, prompting other residents to reach the terrace and alert the police.
Officers from Anandnagar Police arrived at the scene at around 11 pm and began examining the site. Rathod was arrested on 9 August following an overnight search involving around 10 teams from multiple departments.
Agency Owner Booked Under PASARA
Investigation into the guard's appointment led police to A-One Security Agency's licence status. Authorities found that the agency's licence under the Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act (PASARA) had expired on 5 April 2026. The agency, reportedly operating since 2015, had last renewed its licence in 2021 for five years, but no renewal process was initiated after the licence lapsed.
The agency's owner, 50-year-old Ramprakash Tiwari, was questioned over Rathod's appointment and the agency's licence status. Police found that Rathod had been employed without security training, police verification, or a valid security identification card. Anandnagar Police subsequently registered a case against Ramprakash Harishankar under Section 20(1) of the Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005. Further investigation into the agency's operations is under way.
Escape Attempt and Police Firing
The case took a further turn during a recovery panchnama in Hebatpur, when police allege that Dharamsingh attempted to escape custody and tried to snatch the service revolver of Police Inspector R S Parmar. During the ensuing scuffle, Constable Virendrasinh was injured. Police fired two rounds, one of which struck Dharamsingh in the leg. Both were taken to hospital and were reported to be stable.
Police have said a separate case will be registered against Rathod in connection with the alleged escape attempt and bid to seize the firearm, while the original rape investigation continues.
Regulatory Gaps Under Scrutiny
The incident has brought into sharp focus the regulatory framework governing private security agencies in India. PASARA mandates that agencies maintain valid licences and ensure guards undergo prescribed training and police verification before deployment. In this case, all three requirements were allegedly violated. This comes amid broader concerns about oversight of the private security sector, which employs millions across the country with varying levels of regulatory compliance. Authorities have not yet indicated whether a wider audit of security agencies in the region is planned.