Could Compensation Rise if Air India Staff's Omission is Proven?

Synopsis
As the nation grieves the Ahmedabad air crash victims, the upcoming inquiry findings hold critical implications. Discover how any proven <b>"omission"</b> by Air India could dramatically elevate compensation payouts for victims' families.
Key Takeaways
- Compensation can increase if airline negligence is proven.
- The Carriage by Air Act 1972 outlines compensation guidelines.
- Maximum liability limits may be overridden by proven recklessness.
- India adheres to international conventions governing air carrier liability.
- The 1988 Ahmedabad crash highlights the importance of accountability.
New Delhi, June 12 (NationPress) In the wake of national grief following the tragic Ahmedabad air crash, attention is now directed towards the inquiry's findings, as any "omission" by the airline could significantly affect the compensation awarded.
The Carriage by Air Act 1972 serves as the primary legal framework for determining the compensation entitled to victims and their families in cases of injury or fatality. Should any "omission" by the airline be established, the resulting compensation could surpass the carrier's limited liability.
According to a clause concerning limited liability, the maximum compensation amount stipulated is francs 2,50,000, as outlined under Rules 17 and 22 of the Second Schedule to the Carriage by Air Act 1972.
Specifically, Rule 17 asserts, "The carrier is liable for damage sustained in the event of the death or wounding of a passenger or any other bodily injury suffered by a passenger, if the accident which caused the damage occurred on board the aircraft or during the operations of embarking or disembarking."
However, should the victim or their family prove recklessness on the part of the airline or its employees in court, the maximum compensation allowed under Rule 17 could be negated.
Compensation could exceed the predetermined limited amount if it is shown that the damage stemmed from an act or omission by the airline performed recklessly and with knowledge of potential harm, thus nullifying the liability limit.
Rule 25 of the Second Schedule to the Carriage by Air Act 1972 states, "The liability limits specified in Rule 22 shall not apply if it is proven that the damage resulted from an act or omission of the carrier, his servants or agents, done with intent to cause harm or recklessly with the knowledge that damage would likely ensue; provided that in the case of such acts by a servant or agent, it must also be shown that he was acting within the scope of his employment."
As a signatory to the Warsaw Convention 1929, along with the amendments introduced by the Hague Protocol 1955, India adheres to an international legal framework governing air carrier liability for passenger injury or death. These agreements were implemented through the Carriage by Air Act 1972.
In the 1988 Ahmedabad air crash that resulted in the loss of 133 lives, the victims’ families engaged in a lengthy legal struggle for enhanced compensation, culminating in their favor in 2009 after a protracted two-decade battle.