Is NCP-SP leader Jitendra Awhad challenging the relevance of Sanatani ideology?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold declaration, NCP-SP leader Jitendra Awhad challenges the rising prominence of Sanatan Dharma, linking it to systemic inequality and caste biases rooted in the Manusmriti. His insights shed light on the historical injustices faced by reformers, prompting a reevaluation of traditional ideologies. A powerful critique that resonates with contemporary socio-political debates.
Key Takeaways
- Awhad critiques Sanatani ideology for its ties to caste discrimination.
- The Manusmriti is criticized as a source of inequality.
- Awhad emphasizes the importance of education for women.
- He draws parallels with historical reformers.
- His assertions reflect a growing discourse on Hindu identity.
New Delhi, Aug 3 (NationPress) In a passionate response to the escalating political discourse regarding Sanatan Dharma, senior NCP (SP) leader Jitendra Awhad launched a pointed critique of the ideology, connecting it with caste-driven discrimination and the inequalities embedded in the Manusmriti.
Speaking to IANS from Thane, he emphasized, “I have been vocal about this for 30 years — this struggle isn’t new for me,” while affirming his Hindu identity. “I don’t require validation from anyone to assert my Hinduism. But tell me — how many Hindus in Maharashtra have had to seek permission to construct temples..?”
Awhad made a distinction between Hinduism as a faith and the Sanatani ideology, which he perceives as politically manipulated. “The core of Sanatan is rooted in the Manusmriti, which is replete with inequality,” he stated, referencing the historical injustices faced by social reformers like Dr B.R. Ambedkar and Mahatma Phule.
He condemned the adherence to rigid traditionalism, questioning, “Should daughters remain uneducated? Should we treat them as disposable after use?” Highlighting Ambedkar’s early experiences, Awhad recalled how he was made to sit outside the classroom. “Yet he provided us with the Constitution. His struggle was against the Manusmriti,” he remarked.
In response to Minister Nitesh Rane’s prior comments aimed at him, Awhad stated, “Everyone possesses the right to express themselves — a right conferred by the Constitution, not the Manusmriti. Criticize me if you wish, but I refuse to be muted.”
Referencing historical injustices, he probed: “Was there no inequality in Bharat? Did people not rise against Jyotirao Phule? Did they not attack his wife with cow dung? Was Shivaji Maharaj’s coronation not met with resistance? Who plotted against Shivaji and Sambhaji... They too were Hindus,” he asserted.
He further remarked that individuals uncomfortable with such realities would “evade when confronted with these questions.”
Point of View
I find Jitendra Awhad's critique of Sanatani ideology to be a significant contribution to the ongoing discourse about caste discrimination and the relevance of historical texts like the Manusmriti. His insights reflect a broader national dialogue that questions entrenched beliefs and seeks to promote inclusivity. It's crucial to explore such perspectives to foster understanding and progress in our society.
NationPress
07/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main points Jitendra Awhad makes against Sanatani ideology?
Jitendra Awhad critiques Sanatani ideology for its connection to caste discrimination and the inequalities present in the Manusmriti, emphasizing the need for a reevaluation of traditional beliefs.
How does Awhad relate his views to historical figures?
Awhad references social reformers like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Jyotirao Phule, highlighting the injustices they faced and their struggles against oppressive ideologies.
What is Awhad's stance on Hindu identity?
Awhad asserts his Hindu identity while arguing that he does not require validation from others, emphasizing the importance of questioning existing traditions.
How does Awhad respond to criticism from political opponents?
Awhad maintains that everyone has the right to express their views, a right granted by the Constitution, and he refuses to be silenced by opponents.
What historical injustices does Awhad highlight in his critique?
He points out various instances of inequality and violence against historical figures like Jyotirao Phule, advocating for recognition of these injustices.
