Ayodhya Ram Temple donation scam probe a 'farce', says Shiv Sena(UBT)

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ayodhya Ram Temple donation scam probe a 'farce', says Shiv Sena(UBT)

Synopsis

Shiv Sena (UBT) has called the Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft investigation a staged cover-up, alleging ₹500 crore in missing offerings, a 75% crash in pilgrim numbers, and a local economy in freefall — while asking why PM Modi has stayed silent on a scandal tied to his biggest political legacy.

Key Takeaways

Shiv Sena (UBT) branded the Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft probe a 'farce' in a Saamana editorial on Tuesday .
The party alleged the theft amounts to at least ₹500 crore , with gold, silver, and jewellery reportedly missing; over ₹14,000 crore was collected for the temple over 12–13 years with no public accounting.
Pilgrim footfall has reportedly dropped by 75 per cent , with hotel occupancy falling to 25 per cent and daily vendor earnings collapsing from ₹4,000–₹5,000 to under ₹1,000 .
Ram Temple Construction Committee Chairman Nripendra Mishra's expression of regret was dismissed as insufficient by the party.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence — including in his 'Mann Ki Baat' programme — was specifically called out by the Thackeray camp.
The editorial alleged the ongoing police investigation is a 'cover-up' designed to shield the 'main thieves.'

Shiv Sena (UBT) on Tuesday launched a sharp attack on the Centre over the alleged multi-crore donation theft at the Ayodhya Ram Temple, accusing the ruling establishment of shielding the accused and dismissing the investigation as a deliberate cover-up. The party's broadside came through a scathing editorial in its mouthpiece 'Saamana', targeting both the Ram Temple Construction Committee and Prime Minister Narendra Modi for what it called a conspicuous silence on a scandal that has rattled the Hindu community.

Mishra's Regret Called Insufficient

The editorial took direct aim at Ram Temple Construction Committee Chairman Nripendra Mishra, who recently described the donation embezzlement as a 'blot' that had left everyone feeling deeply insulted. While acknowledging that Mishra had put the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in an awkward position by admitting that the firing on Kar Sevaks during Mulayam Singh Yadav's tenure as Chief Minister was not a direct government order, the party argued his personal expressions of remorse fall far short of what the situation demands.

According to the editorial, over 12–13 years, an estimated ₹14,000 crore was collected in the name of the Ram Temple project with no public accountability. The alleged donation theft alone, the paper claimed, amounts to at least ₹500 crore, with significant quantities of gold, silver, and jewellery reportedly missing. 'If valuable offerings made to Lord Ram have been stolen, the temple trust's treasurer and board of trustees should have been the first to face criminal charges. Instead, Mishra merely let out a whimper of regret,' the editorial stated.

Pilgrim Footfall and Local Economy Hit Hard

The Uddhav Thackeray-led party claimed the scandal has severely dented public faith, creating what the editorial described as an atmosphere in which 'Lord Ram no longer resides in Ayodhya.' It cited a reported 75 per cent drop in pilgrim footfall as evidence of the reputational damage inflicted on the shrine.

The economic fallout for Ayodhya's religious tourism ecosystem has been stark, according to the editorial. Darshan waiting times have reportedly fallen from four hours to just 30–45 minutes due to thinning crowds. Hotel occupancy has plummeted to 25 per cent, causing anxiety among investors building a hundred new hotels in the area. Street vendors selling garlands and prasad, who previously earned ₹4,000–₹5,000 daily, are now reportedly struggling to make even ₹1,000. E-rickshaw drivers and local restaurants have also witnessed a steep drop in daily earnings.

Modi's Silence Under Scrutiny

The party questioned why Prime Minister Modi — who along with BJP-aligned Hindutva organisations took prominent credit for the temple's construction and the Pran Pratishtha consecration ceremony — has not made any personal statement on the theft. The editorial noted that Modi did not address the issue in his 'Mann Ki Baat' radio programme, did not apologise to Lord Ram, and did not acknowledge the memory of the martyred Kar Sevaks.

Shiv Sena (UBT) alleged that by shielding those it called the 'main thieves' — who reportedly hold the keys to the temple — the credibility of the BJP and the broader Sangh Parivar has been 'completely shattered.'

Investigation Branded a Cover-Up

The editorial concluded that the ongoing police investigation and the arrests made so far amount to nothing more than a 'cover-up,' arguing that the probe has been designed to protect the powerful rather than deliver accountability. Critics argue that without an independent inquiry, the full scale of the alleged embezzlement may never come to light.

The controversy comes at a politically sensitive moment, with the Ram Temple having been central to the BJP's electoral identity for decades. Whether the Centre responds with a formal accountability mechanism or continues to let the matter be handled at the state and trust level will be closely watched.

Point of View

If independently verified, represent a serious accountability failure at a trust that operates largely outside public audit. What makes the silence from the Centre politically costly is context: the Ram Temple consecration was the BJP's most visible governance achievement in its third term. Allowing the scandal to fester without a credible independent probe risks converting a devotional symbol into an electoral liability.
NationPress
14 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft case?
The case involves alleged embezzlement of donations at the Ayodhya Ram Temple, with Shiv Sena (UBT) claiming at least ₹500 crore in cash, gold, silver, and jewellery is missing. Ram Temple Construction Committee Chairman Nripendra Mishra has called the incident a 'blot,' though no senior trust official has yet faced criminal charges.
What did Shiv Sena (UBT) say in the Saamana editorial?
The party's mouthpiece Saamana published a scathing editorial calling the police investigation a 'cover-up' and Mishra's regret a 'farce.' It alleged that over ₹14,000 crore was collected for the temple project over 12–13 years with no public accountability, and questioned why PM Modi has not spoken on the matter.
How has the alleged scam affected Ayodhya's religious tourism?
According to the Saamana editorial, pilgrim footfall has dropped by 75 per cent. Hotel occupancy has fallen to 25 per cent, darshan wait times have shrunk from four hours to 30–45 minutes, and street vendors who once earned ₹4,000–₹5,000 daily are now reportedly making under ₹1,000.
Why is PM Modi's silence significant in this controversy?
Shiv Sena (UBT) argues that since PM Modi and BJP-aligned Hindutva organisations took prominent credit for the temple's construction and the Pran Pratishtha ceremony, his silence on the theft — including in his Mann Ki Baat programme — amounts to a failure of accountability toward devotees.
Who is Nripendra Mishra and what is his role in the controversy?
Nripendra Mishra is the Chairman of the Ram Temple Construction Committee. He recently acknowledged the donation embezzlement as a 'blot,' but Shiv Sena (UBT) contends that a personal expression of regret is wholly inadequate given the alleged scale of the theft and the absence of criminal action against senior trust officials.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 days ago
  2. 3 days ago
  3. 4 days ago
  4. 1 week ago
  5. 2 weeks ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 3 weeks ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google