Will the Bengal School Job Case Change Teacher Recruitment Results?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The petition challenges teacher recruitment results in West Bengal.
- It alleges the inclusion of candidates with corruption ties.
- A significant number of candidates have qualified for interviews.
- The Supreme Court has set a deadline for recruitment completion.
- Additional petitions are being heard on related grounds.
Kolkata, Nov 19 (NationPress) A petition has been submitted to the Calcutta High Court’s single-judge bench, presided over by Justice Amrita Sinha, contesting the outcomes of the written exam for new hires of higher secondary educators in state-operated schools of West Bengal. This petition is set for its initial hearing on Wednesday.
The current recruitment drive aims to fill positions left vacant due to the cancellation of approximately 26,000 school jobs by a division bench of the Supreme Court earlier this year. When announcing this ruling in April, the Supreme Court prohibited the participation of “tainted” teachers, who had secured their positions through corrupt practices, from joining the new recruitment efforts.
The individual who filed the petition claims that the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) ignored the Supreme Court's directive by permitting numerous “tainted” candidates to sit for the written examination in this new recruitment cycle. According to the published results from last week, many of these candidates even managed to qualify for the interview stage.
About 20,000 candidates who took the written exam for this fresh recruitment have qualified for the interview, with the document verification process beginning on November 18.
On the same day, an additional petition was lodged with Justice Sinha's bench, challenging the results on different grounds. This second petition argues that candidates with prior teaching experience in government-recognized private schools should also be entitled to the additional weightage of 10 marks, similar to those with experience in state-run institutions.
The hearing for this second petition is anticipated to occur either on Thursday or Friday.
On April 3 of this year, the Supreme Court upheld a prior decision from a Calcutta High Court division bench that annulled the entire WBSSC panel from 2016.
The Supreme Court supported the Calcutta High Court’s stance that the complete panel had to be annulled since, despite numerous requests from both the high court and the apex court, neither the state education department nor the commission provided two distinct lists separating the “untainted” from the “tainted” candidates.
The apex court mandated that the entire fresh recruitment process must be finalized by December 31 this year.
Even though the Supreme Court has barred “tainted” teachers from the recruitment process, it has permitted “untainted” teachers to apply.