Bengaluru PMLA court orders ₹8.41 crore asset restitution in Ajmera Group case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Bengaluru PMLA court orders ₹8.41 crore asset restitution in Ajmera Group case

Synopsis

A Bengaluru PMLA court has ordered ₹8.41 crore in properties returned to victims of the Ajmera Group fraud — but that sum covers only a slice of the ₹72.9 crore still owed to over 1,000 investors allegedly duped of ₹256 crore. The case exposes how unlicensed deposit-taking firms evaded SEBI and RBI oversight entirely.

Key Takeaways

A Special PMLA Court in Bengaluru ordered restitution of properties worth ₹8.41 crore to victims of the Ajmera Group money laundering case.
Over 1,000 investors were allegedly duped; the group illegally collected ₹256.06 crore , leaving ₹72.9 crore unpaid.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had provisionally attached assets worth ₹8.41 crore after tracing diverted funds used to purchase properties.
The accused operated without licences from SEBI or RBI and without registering as an NBFC .
The ED investigation was triggered by multiple FIRs and a charge sheet filed by the Central Crime Branch (CCB) of the Bengaluru Police.
PMLA proceedings against the Ajmera Group and associates are ongoing before the Special Court.

A Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Bengaluru has ordered the restitution of properties valued at ₹8.41 crore to victims of money laundering and other legitimate claimants in a case involving the Ajmera Group and its associates. The order, confirmed on 12 June, follows an investigation by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) into alleged large-scale investor fraud.

Background: How the Fraud Unfolded

The ED launched its investigation on the basis of multiple FIRs registered against the Managing Directors of the Ajmera Group, Bengaluru, under provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. According to the allegations, entities linked to the group collected investments from members of the public by promising high rates of return. They allegedly cheated over 1,000 investors by neither paying the promised returns nor refunding the principal amounts invested.

The group reportedly collected ₹256.06 crore from the public illegally, with ₹72.9 crore remaining unpaid to investors at the time of the ED's intervention. Investigators found that substantial sums were diverted to the personal bank accounts of the group's directors and related individuals, who subsequently used the funds to purchase properties in their names.

What the ED Investigation Revealed

The ED probe, conducted on the basis of a charge sheet filed by the Central Crime Branch (CCB) of the Bengaluru Police, revealed that the accused had opened partnership firms and accepted deposits from the general public without obtaining any licence or permission from regulatory authorities — namely the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The firms also operated without registering as a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), a mandatory requirement under Indian law for entities accepting public deposits.

During the investigation, the ED issued a Provisional Attachment Order, attaching multiple assets belonging to various individuals connected to the case. A prosecution complaint was subsequently filed before the Special PMLA Court.

The Court Order and Restitution

Recognising the PMLA's core objective of returning proceeds of crime to their rightful owners, the ED submitted a no-objection application before the Special Court, seeking the release of attached properties in favour of genuine claimants and victims. The Special PMLA Court accepted the ED's submission and ordered the release of the attached immovable properties — valued at ₹8.41 crore — to the bona fide claimants.

The ED stated it remains committed to combating financial crimes and ensuring justice for victims of such offences. Notably, this restitution represents only a fraction of the ₹72.9 crore still owed to investors, underscoring the scale of the alleged fraud.

What Happens Next

The broader PMLA proceedings against the Ajmera Group and its associates continue before the Special Court. Affected investors who have not yet filed claims may need to approach the court to establish their status as legitimate claimants. The ED's investigation into any remaining unattached assets is expected to continue as the case progresses.

Point of View

But it should not be mistaken for justice delivered — it is roughly 11% of the ₹72.9 crore still owed to investors, let alone the ₹256 crore allegedly collected. The Ajmera case is a textbook example of regulatory arbitrage: firms collecting public deposits without SEBI registration, RBI approval, or NBFC status operated in plain sight. The deeper question is why such entities are detected only after the damage is done, and whether the ED's attachment powers — effective as they are — can substitute for upstream regulatory vigilance that never materialised.
NationPress
12 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Ajmera Group PMLA case in Bengaluru?
The Ajmera Group case involves allegations that the group's entities collected investments from over 1,000 members of the public in Bengaluru by promising high returns, then allegedly cheated them by paying neither the promised interest nor refunding principal amounts. The Enforcement Directorate investigated the matter under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act after multiple FIRs were registered against the group's Managing Directors.
How much money was allegedly collected and how much remains unpaid?
According to the ED, the Ajmera Group illegally collected ₹256.06 crore from the public. Of this, ₹72.9 crore remains unpaid to investors. The court has now ordered restitution of ₹8.41 crore worth of attached properties to legitimate claimants.
Why did the PMLA court order the release of attached properties?
The Special PMLA Court accepted the ED's no-objection application, recognising the PMLA's stated objective of restoring proceeds of crime to bona fide victims and legitimate claimants. The court ordered the release of immovable properties worth ₹8.41 crore to verified victims of the offence.
What regulatory violations did the Ajmera Group allegedly commit?
The ED investigation found that the accused operated partnership firms that accepted public deposits without obtaining licences from SEBI or RBI, and without registering as a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) — a mandatory requirement under Indian law for entities taking deposits from the public.
What happens next for investors who lost money in the Ajmera Group case?
PMLA proceedings against the Ajmera Group and its associates continue before the Special Court in Bengaluru. Affected investors who have not established their status as legitimate claimants may need to approach the court to do so. The ED's investigation into any remaining unattached assets is expected to continue.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 weeks ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 5 months ago
  5. 7 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google