Bihar CM Samrat Choudhary: Govt bungalow not ancestral property, slams RJD
Synopsis
Bihar CM Samrat Choudhary has turned a bureaucratic eviction notice into a political broadside, publicly declaring that government bungalows are not ancestral property — a direct swipe at the Lalu family’s continued occupation of 10 Circular Road in Patna despite a notice issued as far back as November 2025. The standoff is now a proxy battle over political entitlement in Bihar.
Key Takeaways
Bihar CM Samrat Choudhary attacked the RJD leadership at a public rally in Sheikhpura on Tuesday, 2 June .
The dispute centres on the bungalow at 10 Circular Road, Patna , occupied by Rabri Devi , Lalu Prasad Yadav , and Tejashwi Yadav .
The Building Construction Department issued a vacation notice on 25 November 2025 ; the premises remain unvacated.
The government has allotted an alternative residence to Rabri Devi at 39 Hardinge Road .
Choudhary said he has changed official residences eleven times since 1999 and praised Nitish Kumar for always vacating promptly.
Bihar Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary launched a pointed attack on the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leadership on Tuesday at a public gathering in Sheikhpura, escalating the controversy over the government bungalow at 10 Circular Road, Patna, occupied by former Chief Minister Rabri Devi, her husband Lalu Prasad Yadav, and Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav.
Without naming the family directly, Choudhary declared: “A government bungalow is not anyone’s ancestral property.” The remark was a clear reference to the ongoing standoff over the residence, which the Building Construction Department has ordered vacated within 15 days.
The Bungalow Dispute
The controversy centres on the official accommodation at 10 Circular Road in Patna, long occupied by the Yadav family. According to officials, a vacation notice was first issued on 25 November 2025, but the premises remain occupied. The government has allotted an alternative official residence to Rabri Devi at 39 Hardinge Road, but authorities claim the family has not acted on repeated requests to shift.
What the Chief Minister Said
Choudhary alleged that certain political leaders have grown so attached to government housing that they demand separate residences for different family members, while remaining indifferent to public welfare. He argued that elected representatives must prioritise citizens’ concerns over personal comfort after leaving office.
Reflecting on his own record, the Chief Minister said he had served in multiple ministerial roles — including as Bihar’s Home Minister — without ever treating official accommodation as personal property. He added that after assuming the Chief Minister’s office, he instructed officials to install a signboard outside his residence explicitly stating it belongs to a public servant, not a private individual.
Choudhary’s Own Track Record
The Chief Minister disclosed that he has relocated between official accommodations eleven times since 1999, underscoring what he described as the correct attitude toward government housing. He also drew a favourable comparison with former Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, noting that Kumar vacated his official residence promptly every time he demitted office, without waiting for a government notice.
What Happens Next
With the 15-day vacation deadline now in force and no indication that the Yadav family intends to move, the dispute is likely to deepen. The government’s next step — whether legal action or further administrative pressure — will determine how far the standoff escalates ahead of Bihar’s politically charged calendar.
Point of View
He positions the BJP-led government as the party of institutional propriety against an RJD that critics say treats state resources as family entitlements. What the mainstream coverage underplays is the timeline: the vacation notice dates to November 2025 — over six months ago — yet no legal action has followed. That gap between rhetoric and enforcement raises a question: is this a genuine push to reclaim public property, or a pressure campaign timed for political effect ahead of Bihar’s next electoral cycle?
NationPress
2 Aug 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the 10 Circular Road bungalow controversy in Patna?
It is a dispute over a government bungalow at 10 Circular Road in Patna, occupied by former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi, Lalu Prasad Yadav, and Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav. The Building Construction Department issued a vacation notice on 25 November 2025, but the premises have not been vacated despite an alternative residence being allotted at 39 Hardinge Road.
What did Bihar CM Samrat Choudhary say about the bungalow row?
Choudhary declared at a Sheikhpura rally that ‘a government bungalow is not anyone’s ancestral property,’ criticising political leaders who treat official accommodations as personal or hereditary assets. He argued public representatives must prioritise citizens over retaining government housing after leaving office.
How long has the vacation notice been pending?
The vacation notice was issued on 25 November 2025, making it over six months old as of June 2025. Despite repeated requests and communications from authorities, the family has continued to occupy the residence at 10 Circular Road.
What alternative has the government offered the Yadav family?
The Bihar government has allotted an official residence at 39 Hardinge Road in Patna to Rabri Devi as an alternative to the 10 Circular Road bungalow. Authorities say the offer has not been accepted despite multiple follow-ups.
Why did Choudhary reference Nitish Kumar in his remarks?
Choudhary cited former Chief Minister Nitish Kumar as a positive example, noting that Kumar vacated his official residence promptly every time he left office without waiting for a government notice — a contrast to the current situation with the RJD-linked occupants.
