Did Pawan Khera Hold Dual Voter IDs? BJP Claims Misuse of Form 6
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The BJP's Amit Malviya has accused Congress leader Pawan Khera of electoral fraud involving dual voter IDs. While Khera's camp defends his actions as lawful, the BJP insists on the illegality of the situation. What are the implications for Indian politics in this unfolding drama? Read on to find out more.
Key Takeaways
- Amit Malviya accuses Pawan Khera of holding two voter IDs.
- Congress defends Khera's actions as lawful.
- Form 6 is meant for first-time voters, while address changes require Form 8.
- The Election Commission has issued a show-cause notice to Khera.
- This controversy emphasizes the need for transparency in elections.
New Delhi, Sep 11 (NationPress) The BJP's IT cell chief, Amit Malviya, has launched a fierce critique of Congress leader Pawan Khera, alleging that Khera is engaging in electoral misconduct by possessing two voter identity cards. The Congress party, however, asserts that Khera adhered to all necessary procedures while relocating his constituency.
In response to media reports regarding the Election Commission's show-cause notice to Khera, Malviya accused the senior Congress spokesperson of having fraudulently applied for a new EPIC (Elector Photo Identity Card) instead of simply updating his address.
“Pawan Khera, a close aide of Rahul Gandhi, had his own lawyer acknowledge that he completed Form 6 to transfer his name from New Delhi (40) to Jangpura (41). However, the issue lies here: Form 6 is exclusively for new voters who have never registered before. Form 8 should have been used for address changes or moving between constituencies,” Malviya stated on X.
He further accused Khera of “applying for a new EPIC number while keeping his old one—effectively holding two votes—a clear breach of election laws.”
In contrast, Congress has disputed the BJP's allegations. Senior party leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi contended that Khera had revealed his prior registration upon moving in 2017 and appropriately submitted Form 6 in accordance with Rule 13 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.
He added that the Election Commission had made Khera’s personal information public before even verifying its own records.
Malviya, linking this situation to Congress’s wider campaign against the Election Commission, branded Khera as “the loudest voice against vote theft while being guilty of malpractice himself.” He also claimed that the “Congress ecosystem is rife with such Vote Chors,” noting that even Sonia Gandhi had once been registered as a voter twice before obtaining Indian citizenship.
“The reality is clear: Those who accuse others of fraud are, in fact, the biggest fraudsters themselves,” Malviya insisted, calling for the Election Commission to take stringent measures.
Point of View
It is crucial to approach this situation with a balanced perspective. While allegations of electoral misconduct should not be taken lightly, it is equally important to verify claims and maintain trust in the electoral process. Both parties must uphold transparency to ensure the integrity of our democracy.
NationPress
21/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the allegations against Pawan Khera?
The BJP has accused Pawan Khera of holding dual voter IDs and committing electoral malpractice by improperly completing Form 6.
How has Congress responded to these allegations?
Congress asserts that Khera followed due procedures while shifting constituencies and that he disclosed his prior registration.
What is Form 6 used for?
Form 6 is meant for new voters who have never registered before, while Form 8 is for changing addresses or constituencies.
What actions has the Election Commission taken?
The Election Commission issued a show-cause notice to Khera regarding the allegations but has yet to conduct a thorough inquiry.
What does this controversy mean for Indian politics?
This incident highlights ongoing tensions between the BJP and Congress and raises questions about electoral integrity in India.
