Did BJP Celebrate Calcutta HC's Ruling on ED's I-PAC Raid?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The BJP has hailed the Calcutta High Court's decision dismissing the Trinamool Congress's petition against the ED's raid. This ruling has significant implications for political accountability and highlights the ongoing tensions between state and central authorities.
Key Takeaways
- BJP welcomes the Calcutta High Court's ruling.
- The court dismissed the Trinamool's accusations against the ED.
- Justice Ghosh emphasized the legality of the ED's operations.
- This ruling puts pressure on Mamata Banerjee's administration.
- The case is likely to escalate to the Supreme Court.
Kolkata, Jan 14 (NationPress) The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) expressed its approval on Wednesday regarding the ruling issued by the Calcutta High Court, which dismissed a petition from the Trinamool Congress. This petition accused the Enforcement Directorate (ED) of obtaining sensitive party documents during the concurrent raids conducted at the Indian Political Action Committee's (I-PAC) office and the residence of co-founder Pratik Jain on January 8.
The single-judge bench, led by Justice Suvra Ghosh, concluded that the ED officials could not seize any items from the two locations during their operation.
In a statement shared on his official social media, BJP's Information Technology Cell chief and the party's central observer for West Bengal, Amit Malviya, characterized the High Court’s decision as a significant setback for Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.
“The Calcutta High Court has nullified Mamata Banerjee's objections against the Enforcement Directorate, providing a strong reprimand for her apparent interference. After her audacious intrusion into a live ED raid regarding a coal smuggling and money laundering investigation—where she attempted to intimidate central agencies on live camera—the judiciary has now firmly established her limits,” Malviya stated on social media.
Malviya further accused the Chief Minister of demonstrating her disregard for the rule of law and a desperate attempt to conceal corruption.
“Constitutional authorities cannot be cowed down by political drama, and the High Court has made that abundantly clear. Now it's over to the Supreme Court,” Malviya remarked.
On that day, Justice Ghosh’s bench also postponed the hearing on the primary petition lodged by the ED, which alleges that the Chief Minister misused her constitutional authority by allegedly obstructing the official duties of ED officials during the January 8 searches.
Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju requested an adjournment, mentioning that an ED petition on the same matter is currently pending before the Supreme Court.
As of the time this report was generated, there had been no response from the Trinamool Congress.
Point of View
The developments surrounding the Calcutta High Court's ruling reflect a critical moment in Indian politics, highlighting the judiciary's role in maintaining checks and balances. The BJP's response signals a potential shift in the political landscape of West Bengal, amidst ongoing scrutiny of governance and accountability.
NationPress
14/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Calcutta High Court's ruling regarding the ED's I-PAC raid?
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the Trinamool Congress's petition accusing the Enforcement Directorate of illegally collecting confidential documents during the raid.
What are the implications of this ruling for Mamata Banerjee?
The ruling is seen as a significant setback for Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, emphasizing the judiciary's stance against political interference.
What actions did Mamata Banerjee take during the ED raid?
Mamata Banerjee allegedly attempted to intimidate ED officials during the live raid on January 8, which has drawn criticism and legal scrutiny.
