Is Tejashwi's Domicile Promise Just Electoral Drama?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
BJP's Rituraj Sinha challenges Tejashwi Yadav's promise of a domicile-based job reservation policy in Bihar. He argues it could harm Bihari workers in other states and violate constitutional laws. This article delves into the political implications and raises critical questions about the future of job reservations.
Key Takeaways
- Political critique of Tejashwi Yadav's promises
- Concerns over job reservation policies
- Implications for Biharis working outside Bihar
- Constitutional challenges to domicile laws
- Data on state exam candidates
Patna, June 16 (NationPress) Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) National Secretary Rituraj Sinha has made a pointed political critique against Tejashwi Yadav, the Leader of Opposition and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief, accusing him of exploiting the topic of domicile-based job reservations in Bihar for his electoral advantage, thereby misleading the youth.
In a press release issued on Sunday, Sinha criticized Tejashwi's recent commitment to enforce a 100 percent domicile law for government positions, labeling it as “an indication of political naivety” and “a misleading tactic to secure votes at the expense of Bihar's future.”
The BJP representative remarked, “Tejashwi views every significant issue solely through an electoral prism. While the RJD advocates for industrial growth in Bihar, it simultaneously seeks to exclude outsiders from job opportunities. This reflects a clear inconsistency in policy.”
He continued, “This attitude does not embody the vision for Bihar but rather highlights the regressive ideologies of the Lalu family’s politics.”
Sinha raised an important question regarding the potential fallout of Bihar's proposed domicile legislation on Bihari workers employed in other states.
“Over 7.454 crore Biharis are currently employed outside Bihar, in states like Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Karnataka. If Bihar enacts a restrictive domicile law, will other states not respond with similar restrictions?”
He urged Tejashwi to think about the wider repercussions of such a political strategy, stating, “Will this not endanger the livelihood of countless Biharis who are flourishing outside their home state?”
The BJP leader accused Tejashwi of lacking awareness regarding constitutional limitations.
“Domicile-based reservation contravenes Article 16(2) of the Constitution, which prohibits discrimination in public employment based on birthplace or residence,” asserted Sinha.
He referenced legal precedents, including the Supreme Court's dismissal of Haryana’s 75 percent local quota and the invalidation of domicile-based reservations for postgraduate medical seats.
“Those who frequently invoke the Constitution should at least take the time to study it,” he advised Tejashwi Yadav and the RJD.
Sinha also presented data to counter Tejashwi's claims, noting that fewer than five percent of candidates in recent state recruitment examinations originated from outside Bihar.
“Does Tejashwi wish to jeopardize the futures of millions of Biharis for this minimal percentage?” he questioned.
He pointed to previous recruitment initiatives, particularly for school teachers, where limiting non-Bihari applicants resulted in a shortage of qualified candidates, especially in crucial subjects like Mathematics and Science.
Point of View
It's crucial to analyze the claims made by both BJP and RJD regarding domicile laws. While the BJP emphasizes constitutional adherence, the RJD's approach raises questions about inclusivity and economic growth. This ongoing debate highlights the complex interplay between politics and public policy in Bihar.
NationPress
16/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main accusation against Tejashwi Yadav?
Rituraj Sinha accuses Tejashwi Yadav of politicizing the domicile issue for electoral gains.
How many Biharis work outside the state?
Over 7.454 crore Biharis are currently employed in other states such as Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Karnataka.
What constitutional article does Sinha reference?
Sinha references Article 16(2) of the Constitution, which prohibits discrimination in public employment based on domicile.
What percentage of candidates in state exams are from outside Bihar?
Less than five percent of candidates in recent state recruitment exams were from outside Bihar.
What are the implications of a domicile law?
A domicile law could restrict job opportunities for Biharis working outside, causing potential retaliatory laws in other states.
