BJP backs Amit Shah on infiltrators, says Opposition fears SIR voter-list purge

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BJP backs Amit Shah on infiltrators, says Opposition fears SIR voter-list purge

Synopsis

Home Minister Amit Shah's inflammatory remarks on Bangladeshi infiltrators and the SIR voter-list cleanup have triggered a full BJP rally, with party leaders claiming three crore names were illegally added to electoral rolls and that Congress is blocking the purge to protect its own vote bank — a charge that is shaping up as the defining political battle ahead of the next electoral cycle.

Key Takeaways

BJP leaders united behind Home Minister Amit Shah's remarks on Bangladeshi infiltrators and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise on 3 November 2026 .
Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav claimed the SIR identified three crore people who allegedly had their names illegally added to electoral rolls — a figure not independently verified.
BJP Bihar President Sanjay Saraogi said one crore names were deleted in Karnataka following the SIR exercise.
Amit Shah alleged at his Hyderabad padayatra that Congress is opposing the SIR to protect Bangladeshi infiltrators who form its vote bank.
JD(U) National General Secretary Shyam Rajak struck a cautionary note, saying government officials and election authorities must also be held accountable for any voter-roll irregularities.

Home Minister Amit Shah's remarks on Bangladeshi infiltrators and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise drew strong backing from BJP leaders on Tuesday, 3 November, with several senior figures alleging that Opposition parties are resisting the voter-list cleanup because infiltrators form part of their electoral base. The remarks came a day after Shah led a padayatra in Hyderabad, where he directly targeted the Congress over its stance on the SIR process.

BJP Leaders Close Ranks Behind Shah

BJP Bihar President Sanjay Saraogi said Shah had been raising the infiltrators issue consistently across public platforms and was 'absolutely right' to do so. He pointed to Karnataka, a Congress-governed state, where he claimed one crore names had already been deleted from electoral rolls following the SIR exercise. 'Senior ministers there are saying that the SIR was conducted properly,' Saraogi said.

BJP Telangana President Ramchandar Rao said Monday's padayatra in Hyderabad had drawn a strong public response and that Shah had used the occasion to clarify the party's position. 'Congress wants infiltrator voters to remain on the voter list so that they can win elections. They have won elections in many states because of infiltrators, and now that the process of deleting these voters has started, they are afraid,' he said.

Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav said the SIR exercise had identified three crore people who had allegedly had their names illegally inserted into the country's electoral rolls. 'Action must be taken against such people,' he said, backing Shah's call for a thorough purge.

What Amit Shah Said in Hyderabad

Addressing the padayatra gathering on Monday, Shah alleged that the Congress was opposing the SIR specifically to shield Bangladeshi infiltrators from removal. 'By opposing the SIR, the Congress party wants to protect Bangladeshi infiltrators in the country's electoral rolls. But I have come here today to say that Rahul ji and Revanth Reddy ji can put in as much effort as they want. The BJP will ensure that every single infiltrator is removed from the voter list and driven out of the country,' he said. He added that only Indian citizens would be permitted to vote, and alleged that Congress and its allies were shielding non-citizens for electoral gain.

A Note of Caution from an Ally

Not all voices within the ruling coalition were as unequivocal. JD(U) National General Secretary Shyam Rajak urged accountability across the board, arguing that if non-citizens had successfully registered to vote, the fault lay partly with government officials and election authorities. 'There is no need to look for who made the mistakes now. Remove whatever is incorrect and re-enter the names of those who are eligible,' he said — a remark that implicitly pushed back against framing the issue purely as an Opposition failure.

Political Stakes and Broader Context

The SIR exercise has emerged as a flashpoint ahead of upcoming electoral cycles, with the BJP framing it as a national-security and electoral-integrity measure and Opposition parties contending that the process risks disenfranchising legitimate citizens — particularly from marginalised communities. This is the latest in a series of BJP-led campaigns linking irregular voter registrations to illegal immigration from Bangladesh, a theme that has intensified since the party's sweep in the 2024 general election. Critics argue that broad-brush claims about infiltrators can blur the line between undocumented migrants and long-settled minority communities, raising due-process concerns that neither side has fully addressed in public debate.

The scale of the alleged irregularities — three crore names cited by BJP leaders — remains unverified by any independent audit, and the Election Commission of India has not publicly confirmed that figure. How the SIR's findings translate into deletions, and whether affected individuals have adequate recourse, is likely to remain a contested question as the exercise proceeds.

Point of View

Not merely an administrative correction. The claim of three crore illegal registrations is strikingly large — roughly the population of a mid-sized state — yet it has circulated without an independent audit or Election Commission confirmation, a gap that mainstream coverage has glossed over. JD(U)'s mild pushback is a rare reminder that accountability for voter-roll failures runs through government machinery, not just Opposition politics. If the SIR deletions proceed without robust appeal mechanisms, the process risks conflating genuine infiltrators with disenfranchised citizens — a constitutional hazard that neither side is openly reckoning with.
NationPress
3 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is an Election Commission-led process to audit and update electoral rolls, aimed at removing ineligible entries including those of alleged non-citizens. BJP leaders have cited it as evidence of large-scale illegal voter registration, claiming three crore names were flagged, though that figure has not been independently verified.
Why is BJP defending Amit Shah's remarks on infiltrators?
BJP leaders say Shah is right that several Opposition parties relied on votes from Bangladeshi infiltrators who had illegally registered as voters. They argue the Opposition is now opposing the SIR exercise because its removal of such names threatens their electoral support base.
What did Amit Shah say during his Hyderabad padayatra?
Shah alleged that Congress, led by Rahul Gandhi and Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy, was opposing the SIR to keep Bangladeshi infiltrators on voter rolls. He vowed that the BJP would ensure every infiltrator is removed from the voter list and 'driven out of the country.'
Is there any dissent within the ruling coalition over the SIR issue?
JD(U) National General Secretary Shyam Rajak offered a nuanced view, stating that if non-citizens were registered to vote, government officials and election authorities share responsibility for the lapse. He called for correcting errors and restoring eligible names rather than a partisan blame exercise.
How many names have allegedly been deleted from voter rolls so far?
BJP Bihar President Sanjay Saraogi claimed one crore names were deleted in Karnataka following the SIR exercise. Ram Kripal Yadav cited a broader figure of three crore allegedly illegal entries nationwide. Neither number has been confirmed by the Election Commission of India or any independent audit.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 13 hours ago
  2. 18 hours ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 2 weeks ago
  5. 10 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google